Setting the `width` or `height` properties of `HTMLCanvasElement` to a
value greater than 2147483647 will now cause the property to be set to
its default value.
Anchor the minimum functionality for this. WPT has an extensive suite
to test editing functionalities, but they all take a long time to
execute - so let's have a simple regression test in-tree for now.
A couple of reasons:
- Origin's Host (when in the tuple state) can't be null
- There's an "empty host" concept in the spec which is NOT the same as a
null Host, and that was confusing me.
Recently reported against the shadow realm proposal after running into
issues with WPT tests.
In a nested shadow realm, the associated realm is a shadow realm, not
the principal realm. One such issue this fixes is a crash when a nested
shadow realm performs an operation which requires the principal settings
object.
Replicate what we are doing with RSA and parse both the private and
public key when parsing the ASN1.
The only thing that changed in the tests is the error message.
I have divided ANS1 constants by length so that they don't have
trailing zeros that need to be removed.
Also moved OIDs lists to the only place they are used for clarity.
Fixed a couple of WPT tests by adding SECP521r1 to the list of known
curves.
Regardless of what the shorthand property is, if all its longhands are
the same CSS-wide keyword such as "initial" or "inherit", then it's the
same as the shorthand being that value.
This gets us 2 WPT subtest passes.
This wins us 65 new WPT subtest passes! It also shows up that we're
doing the wrong thing in ShorthandStyleValue in places, notably with
the grid properties. However, having one place to fix instead of two
will make it easier to correct them. :^)
In order to be fully correct, we should use the algorithm here:
https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom/#serialize-a-css-value
However, it's quite hand-wavy. What we do have in the meantime is
`ShorthandStyleValue::to_string()`, where we special-case the
serialization rules for shorthands with a generic fallback that's
equivalent to what the previous `get_property_value()` code was doing.
When attempting to set `HTMLProgressElement.max` to a value not greater
than 0, we were previously setting the value to 1. We now retain the
previous value.
This change ensures that the correct default value of 0 is used and
that values greater than 2147483647 will fall back to the default value.
It also splits the display size concept into a separate method, as
this isn't supposed to be used when getting the IDL property.
This change makes Ladybird give the value of the aria-label attribute
the correct precedence for accessible-name computation required by the
“Accessible Name and Description Computation” and HTML-AAM specs and by
the corresponding WPT tests.
Otherwise, without this change, Ladybird fails some of the WPT subtests
of the test at https://wpt.fyi/results/accname/name/comp_label.html.
This change implements full support for the “A. Hidden Not Referenced”
step at https://w3c.github.io/accname/#step2A in the “Accessible Name
and Description Computation” spec — including handling all hidden nodes
that must be ignored, as well as handling hidden nodes that, for the
purposes of accessible-name computation, must not be ignored (due to
having aria-labelledby/aria-describedby references from other nodes).
Otherwise, without this change, not all cases of hidden nodes get
ignored as expected, while cases of nodes that are hidden but that have
aria-labelledby/aria-describedby references from other nodes get
unexpectedly ignored.
Attempting to set `HTMLInputElement.size` to 0 via IDL now throws an
IndexSizeError DOMException. Attempting to set it to a value larger
than 2147483647 results in it being set to the default value.
I dug through the code and the WebCryptoAPI spec to figure out the
reason for `... mixed case parameters` WPT tests and figured out that
our implementation was slightly wrong.
By being closer to the spec we can now pass those tests and also remove
a bunch of duplicated code.
Context: https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/pull/2598#discussion_r1859263798
While the code that did this referred to the HTML spec, other browsers
appear not to have this behavior when parsing XML, and it breaks a WPT
subtest.
This change does not appear to break any tests, and fixes 1 WPT subtest.
Size negotiation should not occur for other viewports, such as iframe,
since that would allow content inside the iframe to affect the size of
the iframe in the containing document.
300 new subtest passes on WPT. :^)
