If the Inspector widget already exists, be sure to inspect the page when
it is re-opened. However, this should be a no-op if the page was already
inspected (as any existing Inspector will be reset if a new page load
began).
Note this is not an issue in the AppKit chrome.
When a QObject subclass (widgets, etc.) are provided a parent, then
ownership of that object is passed to the parent. Similarly, objects
added to a QLayout are owned by the layout.
Thus, do not store these objects in an OwnPtr.
There's no need for 2 overloads for String and DeprecatedString, we can
just use a StringView. This also avoids some cases of needlessly
allocating a DeprecatedString from a StringView when calling this
method.
It is currently a bit messy to pass these options along from main() to
where WebContent is actually launched. If a new flag were to be added,
there are a couple dozen files that need to be updated to pass that flag
along. With this change, the flag can just be added to the struct, set
in main(), and handled in launch_web_content_process().
After moving to navigables, we started reusing the code that populates
session history entries with the srcdoc attribute value from iframes
in `Page::load_html()` for loading HTML.
This change addresses a crash in `determine_the_origin` which occurred
because this method expected the URL to be `about:srcdoc` if we also
provided HTML content (previously, it was the URL passed along with the
HTML content into `load_html()`).
These classes are used as-is in all chromes. Move them to LibWebView so
that non-Serenity chromes don't have to awkwardly reach into its headers
and sources.
This creates WebView::ConsoleClient to handle functionality that will be
common to the JS consoles of all Ladybird chromes. This will let each
chrome focus on just the UI.
Note that this includes the `console.group` functionality that only the
Serenity chrome previously had. This was a FIXME in the Qt chrome, and
it is implemented such that all chromes will receive this functionality
for free.
The old names sounded like awkward English to me, as they implied the
WebContent process is asking for information. In reality, WebContent is
*providing* the information.
This will help a lot with developing chromes for different UI frameworks
where we can see which helper classes and processes are really using Qt
vs just using it to get at helper data.
As a bonus, remove Qt dependency from WebDriver.
