This means the units are defined in a single place instead of two.
Also removed the verify that we didn't produce a bogus % dimension token
in the Tokenizer, since this has never happened and the parser is not a
tokenizer test suite. :^)
"5em" means 5*font-size, but by forcing "em" to mean the presentation
size of the bitmap font actually used, we broke a bunch of layouts that
depended on a correct interpretation of "em".
This means that "em" units will no longer be relative to the exact
size of the bitmap font in use, but I think that's a compromise we'll
have to make, since accurate layouts are more important.
This yields a visual progression on both ACID2 and ACID3. :^)
Nobody makes undefined Lengths now, (although actually removing
Undefined will come in a later commit) so we can remove this parameter,
and `resolved_or_auto()`/`resolved_or_zero()`.
Despite looking like it was still needed, it was only used for passing
to other calls to Length::resolved() recursively. This makes the
various `foo.resolved().resolved()` calls a lot less awkward.
(Though, still quite awkward.)
I think we'd need to separate calculated lengths out to properly tidy
these calls up, but one yak at a time. :^)
Length and Percentage are different types, and sometimes only one or the
other is allowed in a given CSS property. This is a first step towards
separating them.
Previously: Length (and all nearly all of its inline method
definitions) depended on the definition of class CalculatedStyleValue.
Meanwhile, CalculatedStyleValue (and nearly all of its namespaced
structs) depended on the definition of class Length.
Thus, a compilation unit that (for example) only contains
#include <Userland/Libraries/LibWeb/CSS/Length.h>
would fail to compile.
This patch resolves this issue by pushing the inline definition of
various Web::CSS::Length methods into a different file.
In cases where we know the Length is absolute, we know we don't need to
pass in a Layout::Node or FontMetrics etc, and yet we were required to
before. Splitting it means jumping through less hoops that we don't have
to. :^)
Since we expose these strings to web content via LengthStyleValue,
let's not have non-standard brackets in there to confuse anyone trying
to parse these values. :^)
Once we've performed the cascade on a set of values for an element,
we should have enough information to resolve/absolutize some lengths.
Basically, any CSS length that isn't "auto" or a percentage can be
turned into an absolute length (in pixels) as long as we have the
following information:
- The viewport rect
- The parent element's font
- The document element's font
- The element's own font
To ensure that we can absolutize lengths relative to the element's own
font, we now do a separate first pass where font-related properties are
defaulted (in the cascade spec sense of the word) and become usable.
There's a lot more work to do here, but this should open up a lot of
simplification in layout code, since it will no longer need to care
about relative lengths. Layout still needs to resolve percentages, since
we can't do that for some properties until the containing block
dimensions are known.
This isn't 100% spec complaint, as it should use glyph_height()
depending on what the value of the writing-mode is, but we haven't
implemented it yet, so I think it'll be good enough for now.
This can be tested in https://wpt.live/css/css-values/ch-unit-008.html
Other css-unit tests fail as:
- 001 shows an issue related to a renderer (looks to me like you can't
pass a width and height property to a span -- adding `display: block`
to it passes the test),
- 002-004 and 009-012 use mentioned writing-mode,
- 016-017 loads custom fonts, which we also don't support (yet).
This patch finally adds the actual calculation that goes into calc()
expressions. When the resolution of a Length that is a calculated value
the parsed CalculatedStyleValue gets traversed and appropriate values
get calculated.
This is a bit hackish, but this way the existance of the calc()
becomes transparent to the user who just wants a Length and doesn't
care where it came from.
SPDX License Identifiers are a more compact / standardized
way of representing file license information.
See: https://spdx.dev/resources/use/#identifiers
This was done with the `ambr` search and replace tool.
ambr --no-parent-ignore --key-from-file --rep-from-file key.txt rep.txt *
This warning informs of float-to-double conversions. The best solution
seems to be to do math *either* in 32-bit *or* in 64-bit, and only to
cross over when absolutely necessary.
(...and ASSERT_NOT_REACHED => VERIFY_NOT_REACHED)
Since all of these checks are done in release builds as well,
let's rename them to VERIFY to prevent confusion, as everyone is
used to assertions being compiled out in release.
We can introduce a new ASSERT macro that is specifically for debug
checks, but I'm doing this wholesale conversion first since we've
accumulated thousands of these already, and it's not immediately
obvious which ones are suitable for ASSERT.
