Instead of using Optional<LengthPercentage>, we now use LengthPercentage
for these values. The initial values are all `auto`.
This avoids having to check `has_value()` in a ton of places.
Anonymous wrappers get their non-inherited properties from the initial
state of a new CSS::ComputedValues object. Before this patch, all the
values in their margin and padding LengthBox would be "auto".
The spec grammar for `text-decoration-line` is:
`none | [ underline || overline || line-through || blink ]`
Which means that it's either `none`, or any combination of the other
values. This patch makes that parse for `text-decoration-line` and
`text-decoration`, stores the results as a Vector, and adjusts
`paint_text_decoration()` to run as a loop over all the values that are
provided.
As noted, storing a Vector of values is a bit wasteful, as they could be
stored as flags in a single `u8`. But I was getting too confused trying
to do that in a nice way.
Previously the default was always 1px, which didn't look great on higher
font sizes.
This changes the default thickness to one-tenth to the font height. The
one-tenth part was chosen arbitrarily, but I think it does the job
pretty well. :^)
The `text-shadow` property is almost identical to `box-shadow`:
> Values are interpreted as for box-shadow [CSS-BACKGROUNDS-3].
> (But note that the inset keyword are not allowed.)
So, let's use the same data structures and parsing code for both. :^)
Previosly, we used only the text color as a line decoration color.
The FIXME comment has been directly copy-pasted from the border color
note a few lines below.
"5em" means 5*font-size, but by forcing "em" to mean the presentation
size of the bitmap font actually used, we broke a bunch of layouts that
depended on a correct interpretation of "em".
This means that "em" units will no longer be relative to the exact
size of the bitmap font in use, but I think that's a compromise we'll
have to make, since accurate layouts are more important.
This yields a visual progression on both ACID2 and ACID3. :^)
We also pass whether the shadow goes inside or outside the element. Only
outer shadows are rendered currently, and inner ones may want to be
handled separately from them, as they will never interfere with each
other.
A lot of this is quite ugly, but it should only be so until I remove
Length::Type::Percentage entirely. (Which should happen later in this
PR, otherwise, yell at me!) For now, a lot of things have to be
resolved twice, first from a LengthPercentage to a Length, and then
from a Length to a pixel one.
The flexbox logic confuses me so regressions are possible, though our
test page looks the same as before so it should be fine.
Renamed FlexBasis::Length -> LengthPercentage too, for clarity.
These aren't needed now that we render using background_layers instead.
The one casualty is the resolved style for background-repeat, but that
was incorrect anyway.
Instead of storing these as individual `background-foo` properties, we
combine them together into layers, since that is how they will be
painted. It also makes it more convenient to pass them around.
While right now this doesn't save much complexity, it will do once we
care about multiple background layers per node. Then, having a single
repeat value per layer will simplify things.
It also means we can remove the pseudo-property concept entirely! :^)
Until now, we've internally thought of the CSS "display" property as a
single-value property. In practice, "display" is a much more complex
property that comes in a number of configurations.
The most interesting one is the two-part format that describes the
outside and inside behavior of a box. Switching our own internal
representation towards this model will allow for much cleaner
abstractions around layout and the various formatting contexts.
Note that we don't *parse* two-part "display" yet, this is only about
changing the internal representation of the property.
Spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display
In the spec, `fill` and `stroke` are supposed to be a shorthands for
various properties. But since the spec is still a working draft, and
neither Firefox or Chrome support the `fill-color` or `stroke-color`
properties, we'll stick with `fill` and `stroke` as simple colors for
now.
Also, note that SVG expects things in "user units", and we are assuming
that 1px = 1 user unit for now.
