Having this here instead of in ReplacedBox means we can access it when
figuring out what the "preferred aspect ratio" is.
There's some inconsistency between specs about what this is called, but
they're moving towards referring to this as "natural width/height/
aspect-ratio", so let's copy that terminology.
This simplifies the ownership model between DOM/layout/paint nodes
immensely by deferring to the garbage collector for figuring out what's
live and what's not.
This commit is messy due to the Paintable and Layout classes being
tangled together.
The RadioButton, CheckBox and ButtonBox classes are now subclasses of
FormAssociatedLabelableNode. This subclass separates these layout nodes
from LabelableNode, which is also the superclass of non-form associated
labelable nodes (Progress).
ButtonPaintable, CheckBoxPaintable and RadioButtonPaintable no longer
call events on DOM nodes directly from their mouse event handlers;
instead, all the functionality is now directly in EventHandler, which
dispatches the related events. handle_mousedown and related methods
return a bool indicating whether the event handling should proceed.
Paintable classes can now return an alternative DOM::Node which should
be the target of the mouse event. Labels use this to indicate that the
labeled control should be the target of the mouse events.
HTMLInputElement put its activation behavior on run_activation_behavior,
which wasn't actually called anywhere and had to be manually called by
other places. We now use activation_behavior which is used by
EventDispatcher.
This commit also brings HTMLInputElement closer to spec by removing the
did_foo functions that did ad-hoc event dispatching and unifies the
behavior under run_input_activation_behavior.
Input events have nothing to do with layout, so let's not send them to
layout nodes.
The job of Paintable starts to become clear. It represents a paintable
item that can be rendered into the viewport, which means it can also
be targeted by the mouse cursor.
This patch adds a bunch of Paintable subclasses, each corresponding to
the Layout::Node subclasses that had a paint() override. All painting
logic is moved from layout nodes into their corresponding paintables.
Paintables are now created by asking a Layout::Box to produce one:
static NonnullOwnPtr<Paintable> Layout::Box::create_paintable()
Note that inline nodes still have their painting logic. Since they
are not boxes, and all paintables have a corresponding box, we'll need
to come up with some other solution for them.
The "paintable" state in Layout::Box was actually not safe to access
until after layout had been performed.
As a first step towards making this harder to mess up accidentally,
this patch moves painting information from Layout::Box to a new class:
Painting::Box. Every layout can have a corresponding paint box, and
it holds the final used metrics determined by layout.
The paint box is created and populated by FormattingState::commit().
I've also added DOM::Node::paint_box() as a convenient way to access
the paint box (if available) of a given DOM node.
Going forward, I believe this will allow us to better separate data
that belongs to layout vs painting, and also open up opportunities
for naturally invalidating caches in the paint box (since it's
reconstituted by every layout.)
Apparently it's not only replaced elements that can have intrinsic
sizes, so let's move this concept from ReplacedBox to Box. To avoid
bloating Box, we make the accessors virtual.
Our "frame" concept very closely matches what the web specs call a
"browsing context", so let's rename it to that. :^)
The "main frame" becomes the "top-level browsing context",
and "sub-frames" are now "nested browsing contexts".
SPDX License Identifiers are a more compact / standardized
way of representing file license information.
See: https://spdx.dev/resources/use/#identifiers
This was done with the `ambr` search and replace tool.
ambr --no-parent-ignore --key-from-file --rep-from-file key.txt rep.txt *
This is because it includes the initial node that the function was
called on, which makes it "inclusive" as according to the spec.
This is important as there are non-inclusive variants, particularly
used in the node mutation algorithms.
For example:
<div>
<input type=radio name=group value=item1 />
</div>
<div>
<input type=radio name=group value=item2 />
</div>
Is a valid DOM and clicking on of these radio buttons should uncheck
the other.
