The old name is the result of the perhaps somewhat confusingly named
abstract operation OrdinaryFunctionCreate(), which creates an "ordinary
object" (https://tc39.es/ecma262/#ordinary-object) in contrast to an
"exotic object" (https://tc39.es/ecma262/#exotic-object).
However, the term "Ordinary Function" is not used anywhere in the spec,
instead the created object is referred to as an "ECMAScript Function
Object" (https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-ecmascript-function-objects), so
let's call it that.
The "ordinary" vs. "exotic" distinction is important because there are
also "Built-in Function Objects", which can be either implemented as
ordinary ECMAScript function objects, or as exotic objects (our
NativeFunction).
More work needs to be done to move a lot of infrastructure to
ECMAScriptFunctionObject in order to make FunctionObject nothing more
than an interface for objects that implement [[Call]] and optionally
[[Construct]].
As the name implies (and the spec confirms), this is only ever going to
be an object or "nothing", or "undefined" in the spec. By taking this
literally and updating a check to check for `is_undefined()`, we
introduced a bug - the value was still initialized as an empty value.
Instead, use a pointer to an Object - either we have one, or we don't.
Fixes#8448.
This patch implements the IsSimpleParameterList static semantics for
ordinary function objects.
We now also create an unmapped arguments object for callee contexts
with non-simple parameter lists, instead of only doing it in strict
mode. Covered by test262.
