This commit switches our code to use semconv 1.21, which is the version matching
the OTEL modules, as well as the containerd code.
The BuildKit 0.12.x module currently uses an older version of the OTEL modules,
and uses the semconv 0.17 schema. Mixing schema-versions is problematic, but
we still want to consume BuildKit's "detect" package to wire-up other parts
of OTEL.
To align the versions in our code, this patch sets the BuildKit detect.Resource
with the correct semconv version.
It's worth noting that the BuildKit package has a custom "serviceNameDetector";
https://github.com/moby/buildkit/blob/v0.12.4/util/tracing/detect/detect.go#L153-L169
Whith is merged with OTEL's default resource:
https://github.com/moby/buildkit/blob/v0.12.4/util/tracing/detect/detect.go#L100-L107
There's no need to duplicate that code, as OTEL's `resource.Default()` already
provides this functionality:
- It uses fromEnv{} detector internally: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/blob/v1.19.0/sdk/resource/resource.go#L208
- fromEnv{} detector reads OTEL_SERVICE_NAME: https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/blob/v1.19.0/sdk/resource/env.go#L53
This patch also removes uses of the httpconv package, which is no longer included
in semconv 1.21 and now an internal package. Removing the use of this package
means that hijacked connections will not have the HTTP attributes on the Moby
client span, which isn't ideal, but a limited loss that'd impact exec/attach.
The span itself will still exist, it just won't the additional attributes that
are added by that package.
Alternatively, the httpconv call COULD remain - it will not error and will send
syntactically valid spans but we would be mixing & matching semconv versions,
so won't be compliant.
Some parts of the httpconv package were preserved through a very minimal local
implementation; a variant of `httpconv.ClientStatus(resp.StatusCode))` is added
to set the span status (`span.SetStatus()`). The `httpconv` package has complex
logic for this, but mostly drills down to HTTP status range (1xx/2xx/3xx/4xx/5xx)
to determine if the status was successfull or non-successful (4xx/5xx).
The additional logic it provided was to validate actual status-codes, and to
convert "bogus" status codes in "success" ranges (1xx, 2xx) into an error. That
code seemed over-reaching (and not accounting for potential future _valid_
status codes). Let's assume we only get valid status codes.
- https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/blob/v1.21.0/semconv/v1.17.0/httpconv/http.go#L85-L89
- https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/blob/v1.21.0/semconv/internal/v2/http.go#L322-L330
- https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-go/blob/v1.21.0/semconv/internal/v2/http.go#L356-L404
Signed-off-by: Sebastiaan van Stijn <github@gone.nl>
4d2a324fce