435ecfe6e0
In these cases, continuing after a non nil error will result in a nil dereference in panic. Change the `assert.Check` to `assert.NilError` to avoid that. Signed-off-by: Paweł Gronowski <pawel.gronowski@docker.com>
275 lines
8.4 KiB
Go
275 lines
8.4 KiB
Go
package mounts // import "github.com/docker/docker/volume/mounts"
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"strings"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/docker/docker/api/types/mount"
|
|
"gotest.tools/v3/assert"
|
|
is "gotest.tools/v3/assert/cmp"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
func TestLinuxParseMountRaw(t *testing.T) {
|
|
valid := []string{
|
|
"/home",
|
|
"/home:/home",
|
|
"/home:/something/else",
|
|
"/with space",
|
|
"/home:/with space",
|
|
"relative:/absolute-path",
|
|
"hostPath:/containerPath:ro",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:rw",
|
|
"/rw:/ro",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:shared",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:rshared",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:slave",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:rslave",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:private",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:rprivate",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:ro,shared",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:ro,slave",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:ro,private",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:ro,z,shared",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:ro,Z,slave",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:Z,ro,slave",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:slave,Z,ro",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:Z,slave,ro",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:slave,ro,Z",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:rslave,ro,Z",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:ro,rshared,Z",
|
|
"/hostPath:/containerPath:ro,Z,rprivate",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
invalid := map[string]string{
|
|
"": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"./": "mount path must be absolute",
|
|
"../": "mount path must be absolute",
|
|
"/:../": "mount path must be absolute",
|
|
"/:path": "mount path must be absolute",
|
|
":": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"/tmp:": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
":test": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
":/test": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"tmp:": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
":test:": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"::": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
":::": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"/tmp:::": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
":/tmp::": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"/path:rw": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"/path:ro": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"/rw:rw": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"path:ro": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"/path:/path:sw": `invalid mode`,
|
|
"/path:/path:rwz": `invalid mode`,
|
|
"/path:/path:ro,rshared,rslave": `invalid mode`,
|
|
"/path:/path:ro,z,rshared,rslave": `invalid mode`,
|
|
"/path:shared": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"/path:slave": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"/path:private": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"name:/absolute-path:shared": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"name:/absolute-path:rshared": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"name:/absolute-path:slave": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"name:/absolute-path:rslave": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"name:/absolute-path:private": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
"name:/absolute-path:rprivate": "invalid volume specification",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
parser := NewLinuxParser()
|
|
if p, ok := parser.(*linuxParser); ok {
|
|
p.fi = mockFiProvider{}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, path := range valid {
|
|
if _, err := parser.ParseMountRaw(path, "local"); err != nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("ParseMountRaw(`%q`) should succeed: error %q", path, err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for path, expectedError := range invalid {
|
|
if mp, err := parser.ParseMountRaw(path, "local"); err == nil {
|
|
t.Errorf("ParseMountRaw(`%q`) should have failed validation. Err '%v' - MP: %v", path, err, mp)
|
|
} else {
|
|
if !strings.Contains(err.Error(), expectedError) {
|
|
t.Errorf("ParseMountRaw(`%q`) error should contain %q, got %v", path, expectedError, err.Error())
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestLinuxParseMountRawSplit(t *testing.T) {
|
|
cases := []struct {
|
|
bind string
|
|
driver string
|
|
expType mount.Type
|
|
expDest string
|
|
expSource string
|
|
expName string
|
|
expDriver string
|
|
expRW bool
|
|
fail bool
|
|
}{
|
|
{
|
|
bind: "/tmp:/tmp1",
|
|
expType: mount.TypeBind,
|
|
expDest: "/tmp1",
|
|
expSource: "/tmp",
|
|
expRW: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
bind: "/tmp:/tmp2:ro",
|
|
expType: mount.TypeBind,
|
|
expDest: "/tmp2",
|
|
expSource: "/tmp",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
bind: "/tmp:/tmp3:rw",
|
|
expType: mount.TypeBind,
|
|
expDest: "/tmp3",
|
|
expSource: "/tmp",
|
|
expRW: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
bind: "/tmp:/tmp4:foo",
|
|
expType: mount.TypeBind,
|
|
fail: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
bind: "name:/named1",
|
|
expType: mount.TypeVolume,
|
|
expDest: "/named1",
|
|
expName: "name",
|
|
expRW: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
bind: "name:/named2",
|
|
driver: "external",
|
|
expType: mount.TypeVolume,
|
|
expDest: "/named2",
|
|
expName: "name",
|
|
expDriver: "external",
|
|
expRW: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
bind: "name:/named3:ro",
|
|
driver: "local",
|
|
expType: mount.TypeVolume,
|
|
expDest: "/named3",
|
|
expName: "name",
|
|
expDriver: "local",
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
bind: "local/name:/tmp:rw",
|
|
expType: mount.TypeVolume,
|
|
expDest: "/tmp",
|
|
expName: "local/name",
|
|
expRW: true,
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
bind: "/tmp:tmp",
|
|
expType: mount.TypeBind,
|
|
expRW: true,
|
|
fail: true,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
parser := NewLinuxParser()
|
|
if p, ok := parser.(*linuxParser); ok {
|
|
p.fi = mockFiProvider{}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for _, tc := range cases {
|
|
tc := tc
|
|
t.Run(tc.bind, func(t *testing.T) {
|
|
m, err := parser.ParseMountRaw(tc.bind, tc.driver)
|
|
if tc.fail {
|
|
assert.Check(t, is.ErrorContains(err, ""), "expected an error")
|
|
return
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
assert.NilError(t, err)
|
|
assert.Check(t, is.Equal(m.Destination, tc.expDest))
|
|
assert.Check(t, is.Equal(m.Source, tc.expSource))
|
|
assert.Check(t, is.Equal(m.Name, tc.expName))
|
|
assert.Check(t, is.Equal(m.Driver, tc.expDriver))
|
|
assert.Check(t, is.Equal(m.RW, tc.expRW))
|
|
assert.Check(t, is.Equal(m.Type, tc.expType))
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestLinuxParseMountSpecBindWithFileinfoError makes sure that the parser returns
|
|
// the error produced by the fileinfo provider.
|
|
//
|
|
// Some extra context for the future in case of changes and possible wtf are we
|
|
// testing this for:
|
|
//
|
|
// Currently this "fileInfoProvider" returns (bool, bool, error)
|
|
// The 1st bool is "does this path exist"
|
|
// The 2nd bool is "is this path a dir"
|
|
// Then of course the error is an error.
|
|
//
|
|
// The issue is the parser was ignoring the error and only looking at the
|
|
// "does this path exist" boolean, which is always false if there is an error.
|
|
// Then the error returned to the caller was a (slightly, maybe) friendlier
|
|
// error string than what comes from `os.Stat`
|
|
// So ...the caller was always getting an error saying the path doesn't exist
|
|
// even if it does exist but got some other error (like a permission error).
|
|
// This is confusing to users.
|
|
func TestLinuxParseMountSpecBindWithFileinfoError(t *testing.T) {
|
|
parser := NewLinuxParser()
|
|
testErr := fmt.Errorf("some crazy error")
|
|
if pr, ok := parser.(*linuxParser); ok {
|
|
pr.fi = &mockFiProviderWithError{err: testErr}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
_, err := parser.ParseMountSpec(mount.Mount{
|
|
Type: mount.TypeBind,
|
|
Source: `/bananas`,
|
|
Target: `/bananas`,
|
|
})
|
|
assert.ErrorContains(t, err, testErr.Error())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func TestConvertTmpfsOptions(t *testing.T) {
|
|
type testCase struct {
|
|
opt mount.TmpfsOptions
|
|
readOnly bool
|
|
expectedSubstrings []string
|
|
unexpectedSubstrings []string
|
|
}
|
|
cases := []testCase{
|
|
{
|
|
opt: mount.TmpfsOptions{SizeBytes: 1024 * 1024, Mode: 0o700},
|
|
readOnly: false,
|
|
expectedSubstrings: []string{"size=1m", "mode=700"},
|
|
unexpectedSubstrings: []string{"ro"},
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
opt: mount.TmpfsOptions{},
|
|
readOnly: true,
|
|
expectedSubstrings: []string{"ro"},
|
|
unexpectedSubstrings: []string{},
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
p := NewLinuxParser()
|
|
for _, tc := range cases {
|
|
data, err := p.ConvertTmpfsOptions(&tc.opt, tc.readOnly)
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("could not convert %+v (readOnly: %v) to string: %v",
|
|
tc.opt, tc.readOnly, err)
|
|
}
|
|
t.Logf("data=%q", data)
|
|
for _, s := range tc.expectedSubstrings {
|
|
if !strings.Contains(data, s) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected substring: %s, got %v (case=%+v)", s, data, tc)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
for _, s := range tc.unexpectedSubstrings {
|
|
if strings.Contains(data, s) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected substring: %s, got %v (case=%+v)", s, data, tc)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|