f77a3274b4
Now that most uses of reexec have been replaced with non-reexec
solutions, most of the reexec.Init() calls peppered throughout the test
suites are unnecessary. Furthermore, most of the reexec.Init() calls in
test code neglects to check the return value to determine whether to
exit, which would result in the reexec'ed subprocesses proceeding to run
the tests, which would reexec another subprocess which would proceed to
run the tests, recursively. (That would explain why every reexec
callback used to unconditionally call os.Exit() instead of returning...)
Remove unneeded reexec.Init() calls from test and example code which no
longer needs it, and fix the reexec.Init() calls which are not inert to
exit after a reexec callback is invoked.
Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
(cherry picked from commit
|
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
aaparser | ||
archive | ||
authorization | ||
broadcaster | ||
capabilities | ||
chrootarchive | ||
containerfs | ||
devicemapper | ||
directory | ||
dmesg | ||
fileutils | ||
homedir | ||
idtools | ||
ioutils | ||
jsonmessage | ||
longpath | ||
loopback | ||
meminfo | ||
namesgenerator | ||
parsers | ||
pidfile | ||
platform | ||
platforms | ||
plugingetter | ||
plugins | ||
pools | ||
process | ||
progress | ||
reexec | ||
rootless | ||
stack | ||
stdcopy | ||
streamformatter | ||
stringid | ||
sysinfo | ||
system | ||
tailfile | ||
tarsum | ||
useragent | ||
README.md |
pkg/ is a collection of utility packages used by the Moby project without being specific to its internals.
Utility packages are kept separate from the moby core codebase to keep it as small and concise as possible. If some utilities grow larger and their APIs stabilize, they may be moved to their own repository under the Moby organization, to facilitate re-use by other projects. However that is not the priority.
The directory pkg
is named after the same directory in the camlistore project. Since Brad is a core
Go maintainer, we thought it made sense to copy his methods for organizing Go code :) Thanks Brad!
Because utility packages are small and neatly separated from the rest of the codebase, they are a good place to start for aspiring maintainers and contributors. Get in touch if you want to help maintain them!