Update patch release process
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Porterie <arnaud.porterie@docker.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0771230daa
commit
9596e3c501
1 changed files with 15 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -51,3 +51,18 @@ review sessions take place on a weekly basis, more frequent if needed:
|
|||
> a different procedure. Security releases are developed in a private
|
||||
> repository, released and tested under embargo before they become
|
||||
> publicly available.
|
||||
|
||||
## Deciding on the content of a patch release
|
||||
|
||||
When the criteria for moving forward with a patch release are met, the release
|
||||
manager will decide on the exact content of the release.
|
||||
|
||||
- Fixes to all P0 issues *must* be included in the release.
|
||||
- Fixes to *some* P1, P2, and P3 issues *may* be included as part of the patch
|
||||
release depending on the severity of the issue and the risk associated with
|
||||
the patch.
|
||||
|
||||
Any code delivered as part of a patch release should make life easier for a
|
||||
significant amount of users with zero chance of degrading anybody's experience.
|
||||
A good rule of thumb for that is to limit cherry-picking to small patches, which
|
||||
fix well-understood issues, and which come with verifiable tests.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue