53 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
53 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
|
# Development Report for May 15, 2017
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Daily Meeting
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A daily meeting is hosted on [slack](https://dockercommunity.slack.com) every business day at 9am PST on the channel `#moby-project`.
|
||
|
|
During this meeting, we are talking about the [tasks](https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/32867) needed to be done for splitting moby and docker.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
## Topics discussed last week
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### The CLI split
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Work is in progress to move the "opts" package to the docker/cli repository. The package, was merged into the docker/cli
|
||
|
|
repository through [docker/cli#82](https://github.com/docker/cli/pull/82), preserving Git history, and parts that are not
|
||
|
|
used in Moby have been removed through [moby/moby#33198](https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/33198).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Find a good and non-confusing home for the remaining monolith
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Discussion on this topic is still ongoing, and possible approaches are looked into. The active discussion has moved
|
||
|
|
from GitHub to [https://forums.mobyproject.org/](https://forums.mobyproject.org/t/topic-find-a-good-an-non-confusing-home-for-the-remaining-monolith/37)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Find a place for `/pkg`
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Concerns were raised about moving packages to separate repositories, and it was decided to put some extra effort into
|
||
|
|
breaking up / removing existing packages that likely are not good candidates to become a standalone project.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Update integration-cli tests
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
With the removal of the CLI from the moby repository, new pull requests will have to be tested using API tests instead
|
||
|
|
of using the CLI. Discussion took place whether or not these tests should use the API `client` package, or be completely
|
||
|
|
independend, and make raw HTTP calls.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A topic was created on the forum to discuss options: [evolution of testing](https://forums.mobyproject.org/t/evolution-of-testing-moby/38)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Proposal: split & containerize hack/validate
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
[@AkihiroSuda](https://github.com/AkihiroSuda) is proposing to split and containerize the `hack/validate` script and
|
||
|
|
[started a topic on the forum](https://forums.mobyproject.org/t/proposal-split-containerize-hack-validate/32). An initial
|
||
|
|
proposal to add validation functionality to `vndr` (the vendoring tool in use) was rejected upstream, so alternative
|
||
|
|
approaches were discussed.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Special Interest Groups
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
A "SIG" category was created on the forums to provide a home for Special Interest Groups. The first SIG, [LinuxKit
|
||
|
|
Security](https://forums.mobyproject.org/t/about-the-linuxkit-security-category/44) was started (thanks
|
||
|
|
[@riyazdf](https://github.com/riyazdf)).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### Builder
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The builder dev report can be found [here](builder/2017-05-15.md)
|