moby/daemon/logger/loggerutils/logfile.go

655 lines
18 KiB
Go
Raw Normal View History

package loggerutils // import "github.com/docker/docker/daemon/logger/loggerutils"
import (
"compress/gzip"
"context"
"encoding/json"
"fmt"
"io"
"io/fs"
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
"math"
"os"
"strconv"
"sync"
"time"
"github.com/containerd/containerd/log"
"github.com/docker/docker/daemon/logger"
"github.com/docker/docker/pkg/pools"
"github.com/pkg/errors"
)
// rotateFileMetadata is a metadata of the gzip header of the compressed log file
type rotateFileMetadata struct {
LastTime time.Time `json:"lastTime,omitempty"`
}
// LogFile is Logger implementation for default Docker logging.
type LogFile struct {
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
mu sync.Mutex // protects the logfile access
closed chan struct{}
rotateMu sync.Mutex // blocks the next rotation until the current rotation is completed
// Lock out readers while performing a non-atomic sequence of filesystem
// operations (RLock: open, Lock: rename, delete).
//
// fsopMu should be locked for writing only while holding rotateMu.
fsopMu sync.RWMutex
// Logger configuration
capacity int64 // maximum size of each file
maxFiles int // maximum number of files
compress bool // whether old versions of log files are compressed
perms os.FileMode
// Log file codec
createDecoder MakeDecoderFn
getTailReader GetTailReaderFunc
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
// Log reader state in a 1-buffered channel.
//
// Share memory by communicating: receive to acquire, send to release.
// The state struct is passed around by value so that use-after-send
// bugs cannot escalate to data races.
//
// A method which receives the state value takes ownership of it. The
// owner is responsible for either passing ownership along or sending
// the state back to the channel. By convention, the semantics of
// passing along ownership is expressed with function argument types.
// Methods which take a pointer *logReadState argument borrow the state,
// analogous to functions which require a lock to be held when calling.
// The caller retains ownership. Calling a method which which takes a
// value logFileState argument gives ownership to the callee.
read chan logReadState
decompress *sharedTempFileConverter
pos logPos // Current log file write position.
f *os.File // Current log file for writing.
lastTimestamp time.Time // timestamp of the last log
}
type logPos struct {
// Size of the current file.
size int64
// File rotation sequence number (modulo 2**16).
rotation uint16
}
type logReadState struct {
// Current log file position.
pos logPos
// Wait list to be notified of the value of pos next time it changes.
wait []chan<- logPos
}
// MakeDecoderFn creates a decoder
type MakeDecoderFn func(rdr io.Reader) Decoder
// Decoder is for reading logs
// It is created by the log reader by calling the `MakeDecoderFunc`
type Decoder interface {
// Reset resets the decoder
// Reset is called for certain events, such as log rotations
Reset(io.Reader)
// Decode decodes the next log messeage from the stream
Decode() (*logger.Message, error)
// Close signals to the decoder that it can release whatever resources it was using.
Close()
}
// SizeReaderAt defines a ReaderAt that also reports its size.
// This is used for tailing log files.
type SizeReaderAt interface {
io.Reader
io.ReaderAt
Size() int64
}
type readAtCloser interface {
io.ReaderAt
io.Closer
}
// GetTailReaderFunc is used to truncate a reader to only read as much as is required
// in order to get the passed in number of log lines.
// It returns the sectioned reader, the number of lines that the section reader
// contains, and any error that occurs.
type GetTailReaderFunc func(ctx context.Context, f SizeReaderAt, nLogLines int) (rdr io.Reader, nLines int, err error)
// NewLogFile creates new LogFile
func NewLogFile(logPath string, capacity int64, maxFiles int, compress bool, decodeFunc MakeDecoderFn, perms os.FileMode, getTailReader GetTailReaderFunc) (*LogFile, error) {
log, err := openFile(logPath, os.O_WRONLY|os.O_APPEND|os.O_CREATE, perms)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
size, err := log.Seek(0, io.SeekEnd)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
pos := logPos{
size: size,
// Force a wraparound on first rotation to shake out any
// modular-arithmetic bugs.
rotation: math.MaxUint16,
}
st := make(chan logReadState, 1)
st <- logReadState{pos: pos}
return &LogFile{
f: log,
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
read: st,
pos: pos,
closed: make(chan struct{}),
capacity: capacity,
maxFiles: maxFiles,
compress: compress,
decompress: newSharedTempFileConverter(decompress),
createDecoder: decodeFunc,
perms: perms,
getTailReader: getTailReader,
}, nil
}
// WriteLogEntry writes the provided log message to the current log file.
// This may trigger a rotation event if the max file/capacity limits are hit.
func (w *LogFile) WriteLogEntry(timestamp time.Time, marshalled []byte) error {
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
select {
case <-w.closed:
return errors.New("cannot write because the output file was closed")
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
default:
}
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
w.mu.Lock()
defer w.mu.Unlock()
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
// Are we due for a rotation?
if w.capacity != -1 && w.pos.size >= w.capacity {
if err := w.rotate(); err != nil {
return errors.Wrap(err, "error rotating log file")
}
}
n, err := w.f.Write(marshalled)
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
if err != nil {
return errors.Wrap(err, "error writing log entry")
}
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
w.pos.size += int64(n)
w.lastTimestamp = timestamp
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
// Notify any waiting readers that there is a new log entry to read.
st := <-w.read
defer func() { w.read <- st }()
st.pos = w.pos
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
for _, c := range st.wait {
c <- st.pos
}
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
// Optimization: retain the backing array to save a heap allocation next
// time a reader appends to the list.
if st.wait != nil {
st.wait = st.wait[:0]
}
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
return nil
}
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
func (w *LogFile) rotate() (retErr error) {
w.rotateMu.Lock()
noCompress := w.maxFiles <= 1 || !w.compress
defer func() {
// If we aren't going to run the goroutine to compress the log file, then we need to unlock in this function.
// Otherwise the lock will be released in the goroutine that handles compression.
if retErr != nil || noCompress {
w.rotateMu.Unlock()
}
}()
fname := w.f.Name()
if err := w.f.Close(); err != nil {
// if there was an error during a prior rotate, the file could already be closed
if !errors.Is(err, fs.ErrClosed) {
return errors.Wrap(err, "error closing file")
}
}
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
file, err := func() (*os.File, error) {
w.fsopMu.Lock()
defer w.fsopMu.Unlock()
if err := rotate(fname, w.maxFiles, w.compress); err != nil {
log.G(context.TODO()).WithError(err).Warn("Error rotating log file, log data may have been lost")
} else {
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
// We may have readers working their way through the
// current log file so we can't truncate it. We need to
// start writing new logs to an empty file with the same
// name as the current one so we need to rotate the
// current file out of the way.
if w.maxFiles < 2 {
if err := unlink(fname); err != nil && !errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist) {
log.G(context.TODO()).WithError(err).Error("Error unlinking current log file")
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
}
} else {
if err := os.Rename(fname, fname+".1"); err != nil && !errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist) {
log.G(context.TODO()).WithError(err).Error("Error renaming current log file")
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
}
}
}
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
// Notwithstanding the above, open with the truncate flag anyway
// in case rotation didn't work out as planned.
return openFile(fname, os.O_WRONLY|os.O_TRUNC|os.O_CREATE, w.perms)
}()
if err != nil {
return err
}
w.f = file
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
w.pos = logPos{rotation: w.pos.rotation + 1}
if noCompress {
return nil
}
ts := w.lastTimestamp
go func() {
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
defer w.rotateMu.Unlock()
// No need to hold fsopMu as at no point will the filesystem be
// in a state which would cause problems for readers. Opening
// the uncompressed file is tried first, falling back to the
// compressed one. compressFile only deletes the uncompressed
// file once the compressed one is fully written out, so at no
// point during the compression process will a reader fail to
// open a complete copy of the file.
if err := compressFile(fname+".1", ts); err != nil {
log.G(context.TODO()).WithError(err).Error("Error compressing log file after rotation")
}
}()
return nil
}
func rotate(name string, maxFiles int, compress bool) error {
if maxFiles < 2 {
return nil
}
var extension string
if compress {
extension = ".gz"
}
lastFile := fmt.Sprintf("%s.%d%s", name, maxFiles-1, extension)
err := unlink(lastFile)
if err != nil && !errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist) {
return errors.Wrap(err, "error removing oldest log file")
}
for i := maxFiles - 1; i > 1; i-- {
toPath := name + "." + strconv.Itoa(i) + extension
fromPath := name + "." + strconv.Itoa(i-1) + extension
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
err := os.Rename(fromPath, toPath)
log.G(context.TODO()).WithError(err).WithField("source", fromPath).WithField("target", toPath).Trace("Rotating log file")
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
if err != nil && !errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist) {
return err
}
}
return nil
}
func compressFile(fileName string, lastTimestamp time.Time) (retErr error) {
file, err := open(fileName)
if err != nil {
if errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist) {
log.G(context.TODO()).WithField("file", fileName).WithError(err).Debug("Could not open log file to compress")
return nil
}
return errors.Wrap(err, "failed to open log file")
}
defer func() {
file.Close()
if retErr == nil {
err := unlink(fileName)
if err != nil && !errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist) {
retErr = errors.Wrap(err, "failed to remove source log file")
}
}
}()
outFile, err := openFile(fileName+".gz", os.O_CREATE|os.O_TRUNC|os.O_RDWR, 0640)
if err != nil {
return errors.Wrap(err, "failed to open or create gzip log file")
}
defer func() {
outFile.Close()
if retErr != nil {
if err := unlink(fileName + ".gz"); err != nil && !errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist) {
log.G(context.TODO()).WithError(err).Error("Error cleaning up after failed log compression")
}
}
}()
compressWriter := gzip.NewWriter(outFile)
defer compressWriter.Close()
// Add the last log entry timestamp to the gzip header
extra := rotateFileMetadata{}
extra.LastTime = lastTimestamp
compressWriter.Header.Extra, err = json.Marshal(&extra)
if err != nil {
// Here log the error only and don't return since this is just an optimization.
log.G(context.TODO()).Warningf("Failed to marshal gzip header as JSON: %v", err)
}
_, err = pools.Copy(compressWriter, file)
if err != nil {
return errors.Wrapf(err, "error compressing log file %s", fileName)
}
return nil
}
// MaxFiles return maximum number of files
func (w *LogFile) MaxFiles() int {
return w.maxFiles
}
// Close closes underlying file and signals all readers to stop.
func (w *LogFile) Close() error {
w.mu.Lock()
defer w.mu.Unlock()
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
select {
case <-w.closed:
return nil
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
default:
}
if err := w.f.Close(); err != nil && !errors.Is(err, fs.ErrClosed) {
return err
}
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
close(w.closed)
// Wait until any in-progress rotation is complete.
w.rotateMu.Lock()
w.rotateMu.Unlock() //nolint:staticcheck
return nil
}
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
// ReadLogs decodes entries from log files.
//
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
// It is the caller's responsibility to call ConsumerGone on the LogWatcher.
func (w *LogFile) ReadLogs(config logger.ReadConfig) *logger.LogWatcher {
watcher := logger.NewLogWatcher()
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
// Lock out filesystem operations so that we can capture the read
// position and atomically open the corresponding log file, without the
// file getting rotated out from under us.
w.fsopMu.RLock()
// Capture the read position synchronously to ensure that we start
// following from the last entry logged before ReadLogs was called,
// which is required for flake-free unit testing.
st := <-w.read
pos := st.pos
w.read <- st
go w.readLogsLocked(pos, config, watcher)
return watcher
}
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
// readLogsLocked is the bulk of the implementation of ReadLogs.
//
// w.fsopMu must be locked for reading when calling this method.
// w.fsopMu.RUnlock() is called before returning.
func (w *LogFile) readLogsLocked(currentPos logPos, config logger.ReadConfig, watcher *logger.LogWatcher) {
defer close(watcher.Msg)
currentFile, err := open(w.f.Name())
if err != nil {
watcher.Err <- err
return
}
defer currentFile.Close()
dec := w.createDecoder(nil)
defer dec.Close()
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
currentChunk := io.NewSectionReader(currentFile, 0, currentPos.size)
fwd := newForwarder(config)
if config.Tail != 0 {
// TODO(@cpuguy83): Instead of opening every file, only get the files which
// are needed to tail.
// This is especially costly when compression is enabled.
files, err := w.openRotatedFiles(config)
if err != nil {
watcher.Err <- err
return
}
closeFiles := func() {
for _, f := range files {
f.Close()
}
}
readers := make([]SizeReaderAt, 0, len(files)+1)
for _, f := range files {
switch ff := f.(type) {
case SizeReaderAt:
readers = append(readers, ff)
case interface{ Stat() (fs.FileInfo, error) }:
stat, err := ff.Stat()
if err != nil {
watcher.Err <- errors.Wrap(err, "error reading size of rotated file")
closeFiles()
return
}
readers = append(readers, io.NewSectionReader(f, 0, stat.Size()))
default:
panic(fmt.Errorf("rotated file value %#v (%[1]T) has neither Size() nor Stat() methods", f))
}
}
if currentChunk.Size() > 0 {
readers = append(readers, currentChunk)
}
ok := tailFiles(readers, watcher, dec, w.getTailReader, config.Tail, fwd)
closeFiles()
if !ok {
return
}
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
} else {
w.fsopMu.RUnlock()
}
if !config.Follow {
return
}
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
(&follow{
LogFile: w,
Watcher: watcher,
Decoder: dec,
Forwarder: fwd,
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
}).Do(currentFile, currentPos)
}
daemon/logger: follow LogFile without file watches File watches have been a source of complexity and unreliability in the LogFile follow implementation, especially when combined with file rotation. File change events can be unreliably delivered, especially on Windows, and the polling fallback adds latency. Following across rotations has never worked reliably on Windows. Without synchronization between the log writer and readers, race conditions abound: readers can read from the file while a log entry is only partially written, leading to decode errors and necessitating retries. In addition to the complexities stemming from file watches, the LogFile follow implementation had complexity from needing to handle file truncations, and (due to a now-fixed bug in the polling file watcher implementation) evictions to unlock the log file so it could be rotated. Log files are now always rotated, never truncated, so these situations no longer need to be handled by the follow code. Rewrite the LogFile follow implementation in terms of waiting until LogFile notifies it that a new message has been written to the log file. The LogFile informs the follower of the file offset of the last complete write so that the follower knows not to read past that, preventing it from attempting to decode partial messages and making retries unnecessary. Synchronization between LogFile and its followers is used at critical points to prevent missed notifications of writes and races between file rotations and the follower opening files for read. Signed-off-by: Cory Snider <csnider@mirantis.com>
2022-02-09 19:49:23 +00:00
// openRotatedFiles returns a slice of files open for reading, in order from
// oldest to newest, and calls w.fsopMu.RUnlock() before returning.
//
// This method must only be called with w.fsopMu locked for reading.
func (w *LogFile) openRotatedFiles(config logger.ReadConfig) (files []readAtCloser, err error) {
type rotatedFile struct {
f *os.File
compressed bool
}
var q []rotatedFile
defer func() {
if err != nil {
for _, qq := range q {
qq.f.Close()
}
for _, f := range files {
f.Close()
}
}
}()
q, err = func() (q []rotatedFile, err error) {
defer w.fsopMu.RUnlock()
q = make([]rotatedFile, 0, w.maxFiles)
for i := w.maxFiles; i > 1; i-- {
var f rotatedFile
f.f, err = open(fmt.Sprintf("%s.%d", w.f.Name(), i-1))
if err != nil {
if !errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist) {
return nil, errors.Wrap(err, "error opening rotated log file")
}
f.compressed = true
f.f, err = open(fmt.Sprintf("%s.%d.gz", w.f.Name(), i-1))
if err != nil {
if !errors.Is(err, fs.ErrNotExist) {
return nil, errors.Wrap(err, "error opening file for decompression")
}
continue
}
}
q = append(q, f)
}
return q, nil
}()
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
for len(q) > 0 {
qq := q[0]
q = q[1:]
if qq.compressed {
defer qq.f.Close()
f, err := w.maybeDecompressFile(qq.f, config)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
if f != nil {
// The log before `config.Since` does not need to read
files = append(files, f)
}
} else {
files = append(files, qq.f)
}
}
return files, nil
}
func (w *LogFile) maybeDecompressFile(cf *os.File, config logger.ReadConfig) (readAtCloser, error) {
rc, err := gzip.NewReader(cf)
if err != nil {
return nil, errors.Wrap(err, "error making gzip reader for compressed log file")
}
defer rc.Close()
// Extract the last log entry timestramp from the gzip header
extra := &rotateFileMetadata{}
err = json.Unmarshal(rc.Header.Extra, extra)
if err == nil && !extra.LastTime.IsZero() && extra.LastTime.Before(config.Since) {
return nil, nil
}
tmpf, err := w.decompress.Do(cf)
return tmpf, errors.Wrap(err, "error decompressing log file")
}
func decompress(dst io.WriteSeeker, src io.ReadSeeker) error {
if _, err := src.Seek(0, io.SeekStart); err != nil {
return err
}
rc, err := gzip.NewReader(src)
if err != nil {
return err
}
_, err = pools.Copy(dst, rc)
if err != nil {
return err
}
return rc.Close()
}
func tailFiles(files []SizeReaderAt, watcher *logger.LogWatcher, dec Decoder, getTailReader GetTailReaderFunc, nLines int, fwd *forwarder) (cont bool) {
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
defer cancel()
cont = true
// TODO(@cpuguy83): we should plumb a context through instead of dealing with `WatchClose()` here.
go func() {
select {
case <-ctx.Done():
daemon.ContainerLogs(): fix resource leak on follow When daemon.ContainerLogs() is called with options.follow=true (as in "docker logs --follow"), the "loggerutils.followLogs()" function never returns (even then the logs consumer is gone). As a result, all the resources associated with it (including an opened file descriptor for the log file being read, two FDs for a pipe, and two FDs for inotify watch) are never released. If this is repeated (such as by running "docker logs --follow" and pressing Ctrl-C a few times), this results in DoS caused by either hitting the limit of inotify watches, or the limit of opened files. The only cure is daemon restart. Apparently, what happens is: 1. logs producer (a container) is gone, calling (*LogWatcher).Close() for all its readers (daemon/logger/jsonfilelog/jsonfilelog.go:175). 2. WatchClose() is properly handled by a dedicated goroutine in followLogs(), cancelling the context. 3. Upon receiving the ctx.Done(), the code in followLogs() (daemon/logger/loggerutils/logfile.go#L626-L638) keeps to send messages _synchronously_ (which is OK for now). 4. Logs consumer is gone (Ctrl-C is pressed on a terminal running "docker logs --follow"). Method (*LogWatcher).Close() is properly called (see daemon/logs.go:114). Since it was called before and due to to once.Do(), nothing happens (which is kinda good, as otherwise it will panic on closing a closed channel). 5. A goroutine (see item 3 above) keeps sending log messages synchronously to the logWatcher.Msg channel. Since the channel reader is gone, the channel send operation blocks forever, and resource cleanup set up in defer statements at the beginning of followLogs() never happens. Alas, the fix is somewhat complicated: 1. Distinguish between close from logs producer and logs consumer. To that effect, - yet another channel is added to LogWatcher(); - {Watch,}Close() are renamed to {Watch,}ProducerGone(); - {Watch,}ConsumerGone() are added; *NOTE* that ProducerGone()/WatchProducerGone() pair is ONLY needed in order to stop ConsumerLogs(follow=true) when a container is stopped; otherwise we're not interested in it. In other words, we're only using it in followLogs(). 2. Code that was doing (logWatcher*).Close() is modified to either call ProducerGone() or ConsumerGone(), depending on the context. 3. Code that was waiting for WatchClose() is modified to wait for either ConsumerGone() or ProducerGone(), or both, depending on the context. 4. followLogs() are modified accordingly: - context cancellation is happening on WatchProducerGone(), and once it's received the FileWatcher is closed and waitRead() returns errDone on EOF (i.e. log rotation handling logic is disabled); - due to this, code that was writing synchronously to logWatcher.Msg can be and is removed as the code above it handles this case; - function returns once ConsumerGone is received, freeing all the resources -- this is the bugfix itself. While at it, 1. Let's also remove the ctx usage to simplify the code a bit. It was introduced by commit a69a59ffc7e3d ("Decouple removing the fileWatcher from reading") in order to fix a bug. The bug was actually a deadlock in fsnotify, and the fix was just a workaround. Since then the fsnofify bug has been fixed, and a new fsnotify was vendored in. For more details, please see https://github.com/moby/moby/pull/27782#issuecomment-416794490 2. Since `(*filePoller).Close()` is fixed to remove all the files being watched, there is no need to explicitly call fileWatcher.Remove(name) anymore, so get rid of the extra code. Should fix https://github.com/moby/moby/issues/37391 Signed-off-by: Kir Kolyshkin <kolyshkin@gmail.com>
2018-08-01 04:03:55 +00:00
case <-watcher.WatchConsumerGone():
cancel()
}
}()
readers := make([]io.Reader, 0, len(files))
if nLines > 0 {
for i := len(files) - 1; i >= 0 && nLines > 0; i-- {
tail, n, err := getTailReader(ctx, files[i], nLines)
if err != nil {
watcher.Err <- errors.Wrap(err, "error finding file position to start log tailing")
return false
}
nLines -= n
readers = append([]io.Reader{tail}, readers...)
}
} else {
for _, r := range files {
readers = append(readers, r)
}
}
rdr := io.MultiReader(readers...)
dec.Reset(rdr)
return fwd.Do(watcher, dec)
}
type forwarder struct {
since, until time.Time
}
func newForwarder(config logger.ReadConfig) *forwarder {
return &forwarder{since: config.Since, until: config.Until}
}
// Do reads log messages from dec and sends the messages matching the filter
// conditions to watcher. Do returns cont=true iff it has read all messages from
// dec without encountering a message with a timestamp which is after the
// configured until time.
func (fwd *forwarder) Do(watcher *logger.LogWatcher, dec Decoder) (cont bool) {
for {
msg, err := dec.Decode()
if err != nil {
if errors.Is(err, io.EOF) {
return true
}
watcher.Err <- err
return false
}
if !fwd.since.IsZero() {
if msg.Timestamp.Before(fwd.since) {
continue
}
// We've found our first message with a timestamp >= since. As message
// timestamps might not be monotonic, we need to skip the since check for all
// subsequent messages so we do not filter out later messages which happen to
// have timestamps before since.
fwd.since = time.Time{}
}
if !fwd.until.IsZero() && msg.Timestamp.After(fwd.until) {
return false
}
select {
case <-watcher.WatchConsumerGone():
return false
case watcher.Msg <- msg:
}
}
}