This rule appears to produce a lot of noise, most of them look like
false positives (400+). Lets suppress for now to try to move the signal
to noise ratio higher for PVS-Studio.
Reference: https://pvs-studio.com/en/docs/warnings/v1047/
Much like the sonar cloud workflow, this workflow runs pvs-studio
static analysis, and uploads the SARIF results to github. This
is the most "convenient" way to publish results, but unfortunately
users need write access to the repository to reach static analysis
results rendered in github.
As a work around folks can just look at the logs where issues are
printed during analysis, this works reasonably well.
In the future it might make sense to also render the results as HTML
and publish them using github page, much like we do with man pages.
I believe the pvs-studio plog-converter tool supports that as well.
https://pvs-studio.com/en/docs/manual/0036/
