Previously, attempting to parse a floating point number with an integer
part larger than `(2 ^ 31) - 1` would cause the browser to crash. We now
avoid this by converting the integer part of the number to a `double`
rather than an `i32`.
Fixes wpt/png/exif-chunk.html.
At some point there should probably be some mechanism to handle this
outside of the individual decoder plugins. The TIFF decoder seems to
have its own version of this, and as far as I can tell, the JPEG decoder
doesn't handle this at all, even though that's probably the most common
use case for Exif orientations. :^)
This change imports the WPT accname/name/comp_embedded_control.html
test, along with related resources files it depends on.
Note that in the wai-aria/scripts/aria-utils.js file, this changes the
get_computed_label call to use our window.internals.getComputedLabel.
We paint grid item nodes as a stacking context when they have no
`z-index` style set. However, a grid item could already have a stacking
context established - for example, when the `filter` style is applied.
This causes these nodes to be drawn twice.
Skip painting grid item nodes if a stacking context is already present.
This seems to have vanished from the spec, but in any case, we still
need it. Without this change we erroneously thought that calculations
that match <percentage> did not match <number-percentage>.
This input event handling change is intended to address the following
design issues:
- Having `DOM::Position` is unnecessary complexity when `Selection`
exists because caret position could be described by the selection
object with a collapsed state. Before this change, we had to
synchronize those whenever one of them was modified, and there were
already bugs caused by that, i.e., caret position was not changed when
selection offset was modified from the JS side.
- Selection API exposes selection offset within `<textarea>` and
`<input>`, which is not supposed to happen. These objects should
manage their selection state by themselves and have selection offset
even when they are not displayed.
- `EventHandler` looks only at `DOM::Text` owned by `DOM::Position`
while doing text manipulations. It works fine for `<input>` and
`<textarea>`, but `contenteditable` needs to consider all text
descendant text nodes; i.e., if the cursor is moved outside of
`DOM::Text`, we need to look for an adjacent text node to move the
cursor there.
With this change, `EventHandler` no longer does direct manipulations on
caret position or text content, but instead delegates them to the active
`InputEventsTarget`, which could be either
`FormAssociatedTextControlElement` (for `<input>` and `<textarea>`) or
`EditingHostManager` (for `contenteditable`). The `Selection` object is
used to manage both selection and caret position for `contenteditable`,
and text control elements manage their own selection state that is not
exposed by Selection API.
This change improves text editing on Discord, as now we don't have to
refocus the `contenteditable` element after character input. The problem
was that selection manipulations from the JS side were not propagated
to `DOM::Position`.
I expect this change to make future correctness improvements for
`contenteditable` (and `designMode`) easier, as now it's decoupled from
`<input>` and `<textarea>` and separated from `EventHandler`, which is
quite a busy file.
We use the CSSRule::Type enum for identifying the type of a CSSRule, but
the spec requires that only some of these types are exposed via the
`type` attribute. For the rest, we're required to return 0, so let's do
so. :^)
The spec says that "isTrusted is a convenience that indicates whether
an event is dispatched by the user agent (as opposed to using
dispatchEvent())"
But when dispatching a pageshow event the flag was incorrectly set
to false.
This fixes https://wpt.fyi/results/html/syntax/parsing/the-end.html
In particular, this property now interacts correctly when the flex
container has flex-wrap: wrap-reverse.
This caused some "regressions" in WPT tests for negative overflow in
flex containers, but the previous behavior wasn't correct either,
it just happened to give false positives on tests.
...when running in test mode. This cuts down on the time it takes to run
the imported WPT tests, and you can still get the full error by opening
tests in the browser.
This change imports the WPT html/dom/aria-attribute-reflection.html test
into being an in-tree test — and deletes the related existing test
from https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird/commit/a924e8747a4
previously “ported” from the WPT with changes to run under our (non-WPT)
in-tree test harness.
Similar to LadybirdBrowser/ladybird#1714.
We don't implement the linejoin values `miter-clip` and `arcs`, because
according to the SVG 2 spec:
> The values miter-clip and arcs of the stroke-linejoin property are at
> risk. There are no known browser implementations. See issue Github
> issue w3c/svgwg#592.
Nothing uses this yet. The next step is to change
SVGPathPaintable::paint() to read `graphics_element.stroke_linejoin()`
and `graphics_element.stroke_miterlimit()` when painting.
We were transforming coordinates for SVG gradients in a pretty
convoluted way: an inverse, unscaled transformation matrix was set up in
order to work around some (old?) technical limitations.
Rework this so the coordinate transformation no longer needs to be
inversed. This fixes gradients with "userSpaceOnUse" for its
gradientUnits attribute, which might cause coordinates to lie outside of
the bounding box of the gradient.
Two tests have updated reference screenshots with minor pixel updates;
this is probably the result of floating point precision improvements by
not inversing the matrix.
One test (svg-text-effects) has a bigger change: the gradient stops seem
to have moved along the text. This does seem to match other browsers
slightly better, so I'm moving forward with this ref update.
1. We were not propagating selectedness updates from option to select
if the option was inside an optgroup.
2. When two or more options were selected, we were always favoring the
last one in tree order, instead of the last one that got checked.
3. We were neglecting to return in the `display size is 1` case when
all elements were disabled.
This was covered by some of the :has() selector tests. :^)
We basically need to do this for every invocation of invalidate_style()
right now, so let's just do it inside invalidate_style() itself.
Fixes one missing invalidation issue caught by a WPT test. :^)
And here's the wild part: instead of cloning WPT tests, import the
relevant WPT tests that this fixes into our own test suite.
This works by adding a small Ladybird-specific callback in
resources/testharnessreport.js (which is what that file is meant for!)
Note that these run as text tests, and so they must signal the runner
when they are done. Tests using the "usual" WPT harness should just
work, but tests that do something more freestyle will need manual
signaling if they are to be imported.
I've also increased the test timeout here from 30 to 60 seconds,
to accommodate the larger WPT-style tests.
When aspect-ratio is degenerate (e.g. 0/1 or 1/0) we should
fallback to the same behaviour as `aspect-ratio: auto` according to spec
This commit explicitly handles this case and fixes five WPT test in
css/css-sizing/aspect-ratio (zero-or-infinity-[006-010])
