AK+Tests: Avoid creating invalid code points from malformed UTF-8

Instead of doing anything reasonable, Utf8CodePointIterator returned
invalid code points, for example U+123456. However, many callers of this
iterator assume that a code point is always at most 0x10FFFF.

In fact, this is one of two reasons for the following OSS Fuzz issue:
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=49184
This is probably a very old bug.

In the particular case of URLParser, AK::is_url_code_point got confused:
    return /* ... */ || code_point >= 0xA0;
If code_point is a "code point" beyond 0x10FFFF, this violates the
condition given in the preceding comment, but satisfies the given
condition, which eventually causes URLParser to crash.

This commit fixes *only* the erroneous UTF-8 decoding, and does not
fully resolve OSS-Fuzz#49184.
This commit is contained in:
Ben Wiederhake 2022-09-12 18:25:20 +02:00 committed by Andrew Kaster
parent 3aeb57ed09
commit ff8f3814cc
Notes: sideshowbarker 2024-07-17 06:08:59 +09:00
2 changed files with 31 additions and 0 deletions

View file

@ -274,6 +274,10 @@ u32 Utf8CodePointIterator::operator*() const
code_point_value_so_far |= m_ptr[offset] & 63;
}
if (code_point_value_so_far > 0x10FFFF) {
dbgln_if(UTF8_DEBUG, "Multi-byte sequence is otherwise valid, but code point {:#x} is not permissible.", code_point_value_so_far);
return 0xFFFD;
}
return code_point_value_so_far;
}

View file

@ -191,6 +191,33 @@ TEST_CASE(decode_invalid_ut8)
}
VERIFY(i == expected_size);
}
// Test case 5 : Oversized four-byte sequence (e.g. U+123456)
{
// Want to encode: (000)1 0010 0011 0100 0101 0110
// Into mask: 11110xxx 10xxxxxx 10xxxxxx 10xxxxxx
// Shifted: 100 100011 010001 010110
// Result: 11110100 10100011 10010001 10010110
char raw_data[] = { 'a', (char)0xF4, (char)0xA3, (char)0x91, (char)0x96, 'b' };
Utf8View view { StringView { raw_data, 6 } };
// This definition seems to suggest that we should instead output multiple replacement characters:
// https://encoding.spec.whatwg.org/#ref-for-concept-stream-prepend②
// This is supported by the plaintext description and example collection, which annoyingly does not give an example of how to deal with this:
// https://www.unicode.org/versions/Unicode14.0.0/ch03.pdf , section "U+FFFD Substitution of Maximal Subparts"
// However, that would go against how we deal with several other kinds of errors, so we stick to emitting only one U+FFFD.
u32 expected_characters[] = { 'a', 0xFFFD, 'b' };
String expected_underlying_bytes[] = { "a", "\xF4\xA3\x91\x96", "b" };
size_t expected_size = sizeof(expected_characters) / sizeof(expected_characters[0]);
size_t i = 0;
for (auto it = view.begin(); it != view.end(); ++it) {
u32 code_point = *it;
VERIFY(i < expected_size);
EXPECT_EQ(code_point, expected_characters[i]);
EXPECT_EQ(it.underlying_code_point_bytes(), expected_underlying_bytes[i].bytes());
i++;
}
VERIFY(i == expected_size);
}
}
TEST_CASE(trim)