LibWeb: Don't churn HTML::EventLoop while in microtask checkpoint

At the end of HTML::EventLoop::process(), the loop reschedules itself if
there are more runnable tasks available.

However, the condition was flawed: we would reschedule if there were any
microtasks queued, but those tasks will not be processed if we're
currently within the scope of a microtask checkpoint.

To fix this, we now only reschedule the HTML event loop for microtask
processing *if* we're not already in a microtask checkpoint.

This fixes the 100% CPU churn seen when looking at PRs on GitHub. :^)
This commit is contained in:
Andreas Kling 2023-04-01 11:11:36 +02:00 committed by Linus Groh
parent a5b9fb28c2
commit bc6e61adec
Notes: sideshowbarker 2024-07-17 01:06:10 +09:00

View file

@ -226,8 +226,8 @@ void EventLoop::process()
// FIXME: 2. If there are no tasks in the event loop's task queues and the WorkerGlobalScope object's closing flag is true, then destroy the event loop, aborting these steps, resuming the run a worker steps described in the Web workers section below. // FIXME: 2. If there are no tasks in the event loop's task queues and the WorkerGlobalScope object's closing flag is true, then destroy the event loop, aborting these steps, resuming the run a worker steps described in the Web workers section below.
// If there are tasks in the queue, schedule a new round of processing. :^) // If there are eligible tasks in the queue, schedule a new round of processing. :^)
if (m_task_queue.has_runnable_tasks() || !m_microtask_queue.is_empty()) if (m_task_queue.has_runnable_tasks() || (!m_microtask_queue.is_empty() && !m_performing_a_microtask_checkpoint))
schedule(); schedule();
} }