mirror of
https://github.com/LadybirdBrowser/ladybird.git
synced 2024-11-22 15:40:19 +00:00
LibC: Implement uniform random sampling without modulo bias
This commit is contained in:
parent
e849c62f55
commit
ab07a713bf
Notes:
sideshowbarker
2024-07-18 23:02:33 +09:00
Author: https://github.com/BenWiederhake Commit: https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/commit/ab07a713bf0 Pull-request: https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/pull/5010
1 changed files with 16 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -1039,9 +1039,22 @@ void arc4random_buf(void* buffer, size_t buffer_size)
|
|||
|
||||
uint32_t arc4random_uniform(uint32_t max_bounds)
|
||||
{
|
||||
// XXX: Should actually apply special rules for uniformity; avoid what is
|
||||
// called "modulo bias".
|
||||
return arc4random() % max_bounds;
|
||||
// If we try to divide all 2**32 numbers into groups of "max_bounds" numbers, we may end up
|
||||
// with a group around 2**32-1 that is a bit too small. For this reason, the implementation
|
||||
// `arc4random() % max_bounds` would be insufficient. Here we compute the last number of the
|
||||
// last "full group". Note that if max_bounds is a divisor of UINT32_MAX,
|
||||
// then we end up with UINT32_MAX:
|
||||
const uint32_t max_usable = UINT32_MAX - (static_cast<uint64_t>(UINT32_MAX) + 1) % max_bounds;
|
||||
uint32_t random_value = arc4random();
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < 20 && random_value > max_usable; ++i) {
|
||||
// By chance we picked a value from the incomplete group. Note that this group has size at
|
||||
// most 2**31-1, so picking this group has a chance of less than 50%.
|
||||
// In practice, this means that for the worst possible input, there is still only a
|
||||
// once-in-a-million chance to get to iteration 20. In theory we should be able to loop
|
||||
// forever. Here we prefer marginally imperfect random numbers over weird runtime behavior.
|
||||
random_value = arc4random();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return random_value % max_bounds;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
char* realpath(const char* pathname, char* buffer)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue