LibPDF: Be more cautious of errors when looking for linearization dict

We would previously assume that, following the header, there must be a
valid PDF object that could be a linearization dict.

However, if the file is not linearized, this is not necessarily true.
We now try to detect if there even is an object, and don't treat
parsing errors as fatal.
This commit is contained in:
Julian Offenhäuser 2023-02-21 23:56:49 +01:00 committed by Andreas Kling
parent 6c0f7d83bb
commit 93062e2b78
Notes: sideshowbarker 2024-07-17 06:46:15 +09:00

View file

@ -111,8 +111,21 @@ PDFErrorOr<void> DocumentParser::parse_header()
PDFErrorOr<DocumentParser::LinearizationResult> DocumentParser::initialize_linearization_dict()
{
// parse_header() is called immediately before this, so we are at the right location
auto indirect_value = Value(*TRY(parse_indirect_value()));
// parse_header() is called immediately before this, so we are at the right location.
// There may not actually be a linearization dict, or even a valid PDF object here.
// If that is the case, this file may be completely valid but not linearized.
// If there is indeed a linearization dict, there should be an object number here.
if (!m_reader.matches_number())
return LinearizationResult::NotLinearized;
// At this point, we still don't know for sure if we are dealing with a valid object.
auto indirect_value_or_error = parse_indirect_value();
if (indirect_value_or_error.is_error())
return LinearizationResult::NotLinearized;
auto indirect_value = indirect_value_or_error.value();
auto dict_value = TRY(m_document->resolve(indirect_value));
if (!dict_value.has<NonnullRefPtr<Object>>())
return error("Expected linearization object to be a dictionary");