From 4a8a3df97505174080bc31601c97a3491856187a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Pankaj Raghav <pankydev8@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 21:58:00 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Kernel: Fix index calculation in NVMeQueue submit_sync_sqe
 function

There was a bug while calculating the next index in submit_sync_sqe
function. Use the NVMeQueue's class variable m_qdepth instead of the
hardcoded IO_QUEUE_SIZE.
---
 Kernel/Storage/NVMe/NVMeQueue.cpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Kernel/Storage/NVMe/NVMeQueue.cpp b/Kernel/Storage/NVMe/NVMeQueue.cpp
index 8871fce23e2..f61890c7c92 100644
--- a/Kernel/Storage/NVMe/NVMeQueue.cpp
+++ b/Kernel/Storage/NVMe/NVMeQueue.cpp
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ u16 NVMeQueue::submit_sync_sqe(NVMeSubmission& sub)
             SpinlockLocker lock(m_cq_lock);
             index = m_cq_head - 1;
             if (index < 0)
-                index = IO_QUEUE_SIZE - 1;
+                index = m_qdepth - 1;
         }
         cqe_cid = m_cqe_array[index].command_id;
         Scheduler::yield();