2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2018-2020, Andreas Kling <kling@serenityos.org>
|
2021-06-06 19:03:19 +00:00
|
|
|
* Copyright (c) 2021, Max Wipfli <mail@maxwipfli.ch>
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
*
|
2021-04-22 08:24:48 +00:00
|
|
|
* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2022-08-20 23:04:35 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <AK/RefPtr.h>
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <AK/StringView.h>
|
2022-11-04 17:20:11 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <Kernel/API/Unveil.h>
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <Kernel/FileSystem/Custody.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <Kernel/FileSystem/VirtualFileSystem.h>
|
2021-07-06 09:21:52 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <Kernel/KLexicalPath.h>
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <Kernel/Process.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace Kernel {
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-06 20:12:04 +00:00
|
|
|
static void update_intermediate_node_permissions(UnveilNode& root_node, UnveilAccess new_permissions)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
for (auto& entry : root_node.children()) {
|
|
|
|
auto& node = static_cast<UnveilNode&>(*entry.value);
|
|
|
|
if (node.was_explicitly_unveiled())
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
2022-02-14 13:19:53 +00:00
|
|
|
node.metadata_value().permissions = new_permissions;
|
2021-06-06 20:12:04 +00:00
|
|
|
update_intermediate_node_permissions(node, new_permissions);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-04 17:20:11 +00:00
|
|
|
static ErrorOr<void> update_unveil_data(Process::UnveilData& locked_unveil_data, StringView unveiled_path, UnveilAccess new_permissions)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
auto path_parts = KLexicalPath::parts(unveiled_path);
|
|
|
|
auto it = path_parts.begin();
|
|
|
|
// Note: For the sake of completence, we check if the locked state was inherited
|
|
|
|
// by an execve'd sequence. If that is the case, just silently ignore this.
|
|
|
|
if (locked_unveil_data.state == VeilState::LockedInherited)
|
|
|
|
return {};
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: We have to check again, since the veil may have been locked by another thread
|
|
|
|
// while we were parsing the arguments.
|
|
|
|
if (locked_unveil_data.state == VeilState::Locked)
|
|
|
|
return EPERM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto& matching_node = locked_unveil_data.paths.traverse_until_last_accessible_node(it, path_parts.end());
|
|
|
|
if (it.is_end()) {
|
|
|
|
// If the path has already been explicitly unveiled, do not allow elevating its permissions.
|
|
|
|
if (matching_node.was_explicitly_unveiled()) {
|
|
|
|
if (new_permissions & ~matching_node.permissions())
|
|
|
|
return EPERM;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// It is possible that nodes that are "grandchildren" of the matching node have already been unveiled.
|
|
|
|
// This means that there may be intermediate nodes between this one and the unveiled "grandchildren"
|
|
|
|
// that inherited the current node's previous permissions. Those nodes now need their permissions
|
|
|
|
// updated to match the current node.
|
|
|
|
if (matching_node.permissions() != new_permissions)
|
|
|
|
update_intermediate_node_permissions(matching_node, new_permissions);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
matching_node.metadata_value().explicitly_unveiled = true;
|
|
|
|
matching_node.metadata_value().permissions = new_permissions;
|
|
|
|
locked_unveil_data.state = VeilState::Dropped;
|
|
|
|
return {};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto new_unveiled_path = TRY(KString::try_create(unveiled_path));
|
|
|
|
TRY(matching_node.insert(
|
|
|
|
it,
|
|
|
|
path_parts.end(),
|
|
|
|
{ move(new_unveiled_path), new_permissions, true },
|
|
|
|
[](auto& parent, auto& it) -> ErrorOr<Optional<UnveilMetadata>> {
|
|
|
|
auto path = TRY(KString::formatted("{}/{}", parent.path(), *it));
|
|
|
|
return UnveilMetadata(move(path), parent.permissions(), false);
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VERIFY(locked_unveil_data.state != VeilState::Locked);
|
|
|
|
locked_unveil_data.state = VeilState::Dropped;
|
|
|
|
return {};
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-04-01 17:58:27 +00:00
|
|
|
ErrorOr<FlatPtr> Process::sys$unveil(Userspace<Syscall::SC_unveil_params const*> user_params)
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2022-08-17 02:52:58 +00:00
|
|
|
VERIFY_NO_PROCESS_BIG_LOCK(this);
|
2021-09-05 15:51:37 +00:00
|
|
|
auto params = TRY(copy_typed_from_user(user_params));
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!params.path.characters && !params.permissions.characters) {
|
2022-03-07 20:23:08 +00:00
|
|
|
m_unveil_data.with([&](auto& unveil_data) { unveil_data.state = VeilState::Locked; });
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-04 17:20:11 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!((params.flags & to_underlying(UnveilFlags::CurrentProgram)) || (params.flags & to_underlying(UnveilFlags::AfterExec))))
|
|
|
|
return EINVAL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Note: If we inherited a locked state, then silently ignore the unveil request,
|
|
|
|
// and let the user program potentially deal with an ENOENT error later on.
|
|
|
|
if ((params.flags & static_cast<unsigned>(UnveilFlags::CurrentProgram)) && veil_state() == VeilState::LockedInherited)
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Note: We only lock the unveil state for current program, while allowing adding
|
|
|
|
// indefinitely unveil data before doing the actual exec().
|
|
|
|
if ((params.flags & static_cast<unsigned>(UnveilFlags::CurrentProgram)) && veil_state() == VeilState::Locked)
|
2021-03-01 12:49:16 +00:00
|
|
|
return EPERM;
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!params.path.characters || !params.permissions.characters)
|
2021-03-01 12:49:16 +00:00
|
|
|
return EINVAL;
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-11-21 19:55:20 +00:00
|
|
|
if (params.permissions.length > 5)
|
2021-03-01 12:49:16 +00:00
|
|
|
return EINVAL;
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-09-05 12:30:08 +00:00
|
|
|
auto path = TRY(get_syscall_path_argument(params.path));
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-09-05 12:30:08 +00:00
|
|
|
if (path->is_empty() || !path->view().starts_with('/'))
|
2021-03-01 12:49:16 +00:00
|
|
|
return EINVAL;
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-09-05 12:30:08 +00:00
|
|
|
auto permissions = TRY(try_copy_kstring_from_user(params.permissions));
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-11-05 07:12:23 +00:00
|
|
|
// Let's work out permissions first...
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned new_permissions = 0;
|
2022-04-01 17:58:27 +00:00
|
|
|
for (char const permission : permissions->view()) {
|
2020-08-02 19:06:39 +00:00
|
|
|
switch (permission) {
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
case 'r':
|
2020-12-26 10:24:34 +00:00
|
|
|
new_permissions |= UnveilAccess::Read;
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 'w':
|
2020-12-26 10:24:34 +00:00
|
|
|
new_permissions |= UnveilAccess::Write;
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 'x':
|
2020-12-26 10:24:34 +00:00
|
|
|
new_permissions |= UnveilAccess::Execute;
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
case 'c':
|
2020-12-26 10:24:34 +00:00
|
|
|
new_permissions |= UnveilAccess::CreateOrRemove;
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2020-11-21 19:55:20 +00:00
|
|
|
case 'b':
|
2020-12-26 10:24:34 +00:00
|
|
|
new_permissions |= UnveilAccess::Browse;
|
2020-11-21 19:55:20 +00:00
|
|
|
break;
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
default:
|
2021-03-01 12:49:16 +00:00
|
|
|
return EINVAL;
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-11-05 07:12:23 +00:00
|
|
|
// Now, let's try and resolve the path and obtain custody of the inode on the disk, and if not, bail out with
|
|
|
|
// the error from resolve_path_without_veil()
|
|
|
|
// However, if the user specified unveil() with "c" permissions, we don't set errno if ENOENT is encountered,
|
|
|
|
// because they most likely intend the program to create the file for them later on.
|
|
|
|
// If this case is encountered, the parent node of the path is returned and the custody of that inode is used instead.
|
2022-08-20 23:04:35 +00:00
|
|
|
RefPtr<Custody> parent_custody; // Parent inode in case of ENOENT
|
2021-07-06 10:58:03 +00:00
|
|
|
OwnPtr<KString> new_unveiled_path;
|
2022-08-21 14:02:24 +00:00
|
|
|
auto custody_or_error = VirtualFileSystem::the().resolve_path_without_veil(credentials(), path->view(), VirtualFileSystem::the().root_custody(), &parent_custody);
|
2020-11-05 07:12:23 +00:00
|
|
|
if (!custody_or_error.is_error()) {
|
2021-09-06 10:24:36 +00:00
|
|
|
new_unveiled_path = TRY(custody_or_error.value()->try_serialize_absolute_path());
|
2021-11-07 23:51:39 +00:00
|
|
|
} else if (custody_or_error.error().code() == ENOENT && parent_custody && (new_permissions & UnveilAccess::CreateOrRemove)) {
|
2021-09-06 10:24:36 +00:00
|
|
|
auto parent_custody_path = TRY(parent_custody->try_serialize_absolute_path());
|
2021-09-06 17:24:54 +00:00
|
|
|
new_unveiled_path = TRY(KLexicalPath::try_join(parent_custody_path->view(), KLexicalPath::basename(path->view())));
|
2020-11-05 07:12:23 +00:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
// FIXME Should this be EINVAL?
|
2021-11-07 23:51:39 +00:00
|
|
|
return custody_or_error.release_error();
|
2020-11-05 07:12:23 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2022-11-04 17:20:11 +00:00
|
|
|
if (params.flags & static_cast<unsigned>(UnveilFlags::CurrentProgram)) {
|
|
|
|
TRY(unveil_data().with([&](auto& data) -> ErrorOr<void> {
|
|
|
|
TRY(update_unveil_data(data, new_unveiled_path->view(), static_cast<UnveilAccess>(new_permissions)));
|
|
|
|
return {};
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-06-06 20:12:04 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-11-04 17:20:11 +00:00
|
|
|
if (params.flags & static_cast<unsigned>(UnveilFlags::AfterExec)) {
|
|
|
|
TRY(exec_unveil_data().with([&](auto& data) -> ErrorOr<void> {
|
|
|
|
// Note: The only valid way to get into this state is by using unveil before doing
|
|
|
|
// an actual exec with the UnveilFlags::AfterExec flag. Then this state is applied on
|
|
|
|
// the actual new program unveil data, and never on the m_exec_unveil_data.
|
|
|
|
VERIFY(data.state != VeilState::LockedInherited);
|
|
|
|
TRY(update_unveil_data(data, new_unveiled_path->view(), static_cast<UnveilAccess>(new_permissions)));
|
|
|
|
return {};
|
|
|
|
}));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2020-07-30 21:38:15 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|