0ct0pu5/wesnoth
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

recruit_rushers CA: don't reserve village for passive leader

Browse source 
(cherry-picked from commit b92d8e8226)
This commit is contained in:
mattsc 2018-09-03 07:51:47 -07:00
parent aea3a4f7cb
commit e78237c2a9
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
data/ai/lua/ca_recruit_rushers.lua
View file

@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ if ca_castle_switch then
}) > 0
return take_village
end
return true
return not ai.aspects.passive_leader
end
)
end

4
data/ai/lua/generic_recruit_engine.lua
View file

@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ return {
-- min_turn_1_recruit: function that returns true if only enough units to grab nearby villages should be recruited turn 1, false otherwise
-- (default always returns false)
-- leader_takes_village: function that returns true if and only if the leader is going to move to capture a village this turn
-- (default always returns true)
-- (default returns 'not ai.aspects.passive_leader')
-- Note: the recruiting code assumes full knowledge of units on the map and the recruit lists of other sides for the purpose of
-- finding the best unit types to recruit. It does not work otherwise. It assumes normal vision of the AI side (that is, it disregards
-- hidden enemy units) for determining from which keep hex the leader should recruit and on which castle hexes to recruit new units
@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ return {
data.castle.assigned_villages_x = {}
data.castle.assigned_villages_y = {}
if not params.leader_takes_village or params.leader_takes_village() then
if not ai.aspects.passive_leader and (not params.leader_takes_village or params.leader_takes_village()) then
-- skip one village for the leader
for i,v in ipairs(villages) do
local path, cost = wesnoth.find_path(leader, v[1], v[2], {max_cost = leader.max_moves+1})