check for "new substring of old" to reduce number of false positives
be aware: this can lead to real problems not found but those *should* be (really seldom) cornercases and gettext will bark when updating the files
This commit is contained in:
parent
b1db96ba95
commit
31a26f643e
1 changed files with 6 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -295,9 +295,12 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
|
|||
#complain loudly
|
||||
print "pofix: old string\n\t\"%s\"\n equals new string\n\t\"%s\"\nexiting." % (old, new)
|
||||
sys.exit(1)
|
||||
#this check is problematic and breaks if 'new' is an exact substring of 'old', commenting it out for the moment
|
||||
#elif new in after and old in after:
|
||||
# print "pofix: %s has a msgid \n\t\"%s\"\nand a typoed version \n\t\"%s\"\nthis needs handfixing for now." % (path, old, new)
|
||||
#this check is problematic and the last clause is added to prevent false
|
||||
#positives in case that new is a substring of old, though this can also
|
||||
#lead to "real" probs not found, the real check would be "does replacing
|
||||
#old with new lead to duplicate msgids?" which is not easily done...
|
||||
elif new in after and old in after and not new in old:
|
||||
print "pofix: %s has a msgid \n\t\"%s\"\nand a typoed version \n\t\"%s\"\nthis needs handfixing for now." % (path, old, new)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
after = after.replace(old, new)
|
||||
if after != before:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue