Again, just because device transaction id is greater than pool transaction
id, it does not guarantee that device is in the pool. So do not check
of this during loading of device metadata.
Docker needs to deal with it. And device activation will fail when we try
to activate a device for whom metafile is present but there is no device
in the pool.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Current code is associating a transaction id with each device and if pool
transaction id is greater that value, then current code assumes that device
is there in pool.
Transaction id of pool is a mechanism so that during device creation and
removal one can define a transaction and during startup figure out if
transaction was complete or not. I think we are using transaction id
throughout the code little inappropriately.
For example, if a device is being deleted, it is possible that we deleted
the device from pool but before we could delete metafile docker crashed.
When docker comes back it will think that device is in the pool (due to
device transaction id being less than pool transaction id) but device
is not in the pool.
Similary, it could happen that some data in the pool is corrupted and
during pool repair some devices are lost (without docker knowing about
it). In that case tool pool transaction id will be higher than device
transaction id and there are no guaratees that device is actually in
the pool.
So move away from this model where we think that a device is in pool if pool
transaction id is greater than device transaction Id. Per device
transaction Id just says that after device creation this should be pool's
transaction Id and nothing more.
Transaction id is per pool property (as opposed to per device property) and
will be used internally to figure out if last transaction was complete or
not and recover from failure during docker startup.
If for some reason metafile is present but device is not in pool, then
device activation will fail later.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Current description is misleading. It make an impression the --icc=false
prevents containers to talk with each other.
Signed-off-by: Michal Minar <miminar@redhat.com>
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Michal Minar <miminar@redhat.com> (github: SvenDowideit)
Since Linux 3.18-rc6, overlayfs has been renamed overlay.
This change was introduced by the following commit in linux.git:
ef94b1864d1ed5be54376404bb23d22ed0481feb ovl: rename filesystem type to "overlay"
Signed-off-by: Lénaïc Huard <lhuard@amadeus.com>
Sometimes other programs can bind on ports from our range, so we just
skip this ports on allocation.
Fixes#9293
Probably fixes#8714
Signed-off-by: Alexander Morozov <lk4d4@docker.com>
Currently this content gets a system label and is not writable based on
SELinux controls. This patch will set the labels to the correct label.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Dan Walsh <dwalsh@redhat.com> (github: rhatdan)
These settings need to be in the HostConfig so that they are not
committed to an image and cannot introduce a security issue.
We can safely move this field from the Config to the HostConfig
without any regressions because these settings are consumed at container
created and used to populate fields on the Container struct. Because of
this, existing settings will be honored for containers already created
on a daemon with custom security settings and prevent values being
consumed via an Image.
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosbymichael@gmail.com>
Conflicts:
daemon/create.go
changing config to hostConfig was required to fix the
build
Adds pertitent information about what is expected in the json payload
and comments out unsupported (exec) features in runConfig.
Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <cpuguy83@gmail.com>
