This enables deferred device deletion/removal by default if the driver
version in the kernel is new enough to support the feature.
Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <cpuguy83@gmail.com>
we see a lot of
```
level=debug msg="Failed to unmount a03b1bb6f569421857e5407d73d89451f92724674caa56bfc2170de7e585a00b-init overlay: device or resource busy"
```
in daemon logs and there is a lot of mountpoint leftover.
This cause failed to remove container.
Signed-off-by: Lei Jitang <leijitang@huawei.com>
There is no case which would resolve in this error. The root user always exists, and if the id maps are empty, the default value of 0 is correct.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@docker.com>
The test was failing because TarOptions was using a non-pointer for
ChownOpts, which meant the check for nil was never true, and
createTarFile was never using the hdr.UID/GID
Signed-off-by: Daniel Nephin <dnephin@docker.com>
This commit is an extension of fix for 29325 based on the review comment.
In this commit, the quota size for btrfs is kept in `/var/lib/docker/btrfs/quotas`
so that a daemon restart keeps quota.
Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
This fix tries to address the issue raised in 29325 where
btrfs quota groups are not clean up even after containers
have been destroyed.
The reason for the issue is that btrfs quota groups have
to be explicitly destroyed. This fix fixes this issue.
This fix is tested manually in Ubuntu 16.04,
with steps specified in 29325.
This fix fixes 29325.
Signed-off-by: Yong Tang <yong.tang.github@outlook.com>
OverlayFS is supported on top of btrfs as of Linux Kernel 4.7.
Skip the hard enforcement when on kernel 4.7 or newer and
respect the kernel check override flag on older kernels.
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Changelog#By_feature
Signed-off-by: Derek McGowan <derek@mcgstyle.net>
Before this, if `forceRemove` is set the container data will be removed
no matter what, including if there are issues with removing container
on-disk state (rw layer, container root).
In practice this causes a lot of issues with leaked data sitting on
disk that users are not able to clean up themselves.
This is particularly a problem while the `EBUSY` errors on remove are so
prevalent. So for now let's not keep this behavior.
Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <cpuguy83@gmail.com>
Instead of forcing users to manually configure a block device to use
with devmapper, this gives the user the option to let the devmapper
driver configure a device for them.
Adds several new options to the devmapper storage-opts:
- dm.directlvm_device="" - path to the block device to configure for
direct-lvm
- dm.thinp_percent=95 - sets the percentage of space to use for
storage from the passed in block device
- dm.thinp_metapercent=1 - sets the percentage of space to for metadata
storage from the passed in block device
- dm.thinp_autoextend_threshold=80 - sets the threshold for when `lvm`
should automatically extend the thin pool as a percentage of the total
storage space
- dm.thinp_autoextend_percent=20 - sets the percentage to increase the
thin pool by when an autoextend is triggered.
Defaults are taken from
[here](https://docs.docker.com/engine/userguide/storagedriver/device-mapper-driver/#/configure-direct-lvm-mode-for-production)
The only option that is required is `dm.directlvm_device` for docker to
set everything up.
Changes to these settings are not currently supported and will error
out.
Future work could support allowing changes to these values.
Signed-off-by: Brian Goff <cpuguy83@gmail.com>
if initDevmapper failed after creating thin-pool, the thin-pool will not be removed,
this would cause we can't use the same lvm to create another thin-pool.
Signed-off-by: Lei Jitang <leijitang@huawei.com>
This allows graphdrivers to declare that they can reproduce the original
diff stream for a layer. If they do so, the layer store will not use
tar-split processing, but will still verify the digest on layer export.
This makes it easier to experiment with non-default diff formats.
Signed-off-by: Alfred Landrum <alfred.landrum@docker.com>
Since it was introduced no reports were made and lsof seems to cause
issues on some systems.
Signed-off-by: Kenfe-Mickael Laventure <mickael.laventure@gmail.com>
when doing devices.cancelDeferredRemoval, the device could have been removed
and return ErrEnxio, but it continue to check if it is need to do suspend.
doSuspend := devinfo != nil && devinfo.Exists != 0 uses a devinfo which is
get before devices.cancelDeferredRemoval(baseInfo), it is outdate, the device
has been removed and there is no need to do suspend. If do suspend it will return
devicemapper: Error running deviceSuspend dm_task_run failed.
Signed-off-by: Lei Jitang <leijitang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: John Howard <jhoward@microsoft.com>
This fixes https://github.com/docker/docker/issues/30278 where
there is a race condition in HCS for RS1 and RS2 builds, and enumeration
of compute systems can return access is denied if a silo is being
torn down in the kernel while HCS is attempting to enumerate them.
