|
|
@@ -131,11 +131,12 @@ for each.
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Triage
|
|
|
- [Rules.review.states.nolabel]
|
|
|
+ [Rules.review.states.0-triage]
|
|
|
|
|
|
- # Maintainers are expected to triage new incoming pull requests by adding
|
|
|
- # the correct labels (e.g. `1-design-review`) potentially skipping some steps
|
|
|
- # depending on the kind of pull request. Use common sense for judging.
|
|
|
+ # Maintainers are expected to triage new incoming pull requests by removing
|
|
|
+ # the `0-triage` label and adding the correct labels (e.g. `1-design-review`)
|
|
|
+ # potentially skipping some steps depending on the kind of pull request.
|
|
|
+ # Use common sense for judging.
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
# Checking for DCO should be done at this stage.
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
@@ -157,8 +158,8 @@ for each.
|
|
|
# Ideally, documentation should reflect the expected behavior of the code.
|
|
|
# No code review should take place in this step.
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
- # Once design is approved, this label should be removed and the next label
|
|
|
- # added.
|
|
|
+ # Once design is approved, a maintainer should make sure to remove this label
|
|
|
+ # and add the next one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
close = "design rejected"
|
|
|
3-docs-review = "proposals with only documentation changes"
|
|
|
@@ -168,14 +169,14 @@ for each.
|
|
|
[Rules.review.states.2-code-review]
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Maintainers are expected to review the code and ensure that it is good
|
|
|
- # quality and in accordance with the documentation.
|
|
|
+ # quality and in accordance with the documentation in the PR.
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
# If documentation is absent but expected, maintainers should ask for documentation.
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
# All tests should pass.
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
- # Once code is approved according to the rules of the subsystem, this label
|
|
|
- # should be removed and the next label added.
|
|
|
+ # Once code is approved according to the rules of the subsystem, a maintainer
|
|
|
+ # should make sure to remove this label and add the next one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
close = ""
|
|
|
1-design-review = "raises design concerns"
|
|
|
@@ -190,8 +191,8 @@ for each.
|
|
|
# for any editorial change that makes the documentation more consistent and
|
|
|
# easier to understand.
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
- # Once documentation is approved, this label should be removed and the next
|
|
|
- # label added.
|
|
|
+ # Once documentation is approved, a maintainer should make sure to remove this
|
|
|
+ # label and add the next one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
close = ""
|
|
|
2-code-review = "requires more code changes"
|
Tibor Vass