|
@@ -311,7 +311,9 @@ container:
|
|
|
|
|
|
-m="": Memory limit (format: <number><optional unit>, where unit = b, k, m or g)
|
|
|
-memory-swap="": Total memory limit (memory + swap, format: <number><optional unit>, where unit = b, k, m or g)
|
|
|
- -c=0 : CPU shares (relative weight)
|
|
|
+ -c, --cpu-shares=0 CPU shares (relative weight)
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+### Memory constraints
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have four ways to set memory usage:
|
|
|
- memory=inf, memory-swap=inf (not specify any of them)
|
|
@@ -329,35 +331,40 @@ We have four ways to set memory usage:
|
|
|
It is not allowed to use more than L bytes of memory, swap *plus* memory
|
|
|
usage is limited by S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
-The operator can modify the priority of this container with
|
|
|
-the `-c` option. By default, all containers run at the same priority
|
|
|
-and get the same proportion of CPU cycles, the value specified must be 2
|
|
|
-or higher, if you are not setting `-c` or `--cpu-shares`, the default
|
|
|
-shares of CPU time would be 1024.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-CPU shares is kind of CPU bandwidth weight, the proportion will only
|
|
|
-reflect when CPU-intensive processes are running. When tasks in one
|
|
|
-container are idle, other containers are allowed to borrow the left-over
|
|
|
-CPU time.
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-The actual amount of CPU time can very depending on the number of containers
|
|
|
-running on the system. If a container have a share of 1024 and two other
|
|
|
-containers have share of 512, when processes in all containers attempt to
|
|
|
-use 100% of CPU, the first container would receive 50% of all CPU time, if
|
|
|
-another container with share of 1024 is added, the first container would
|
|
|
-only get 33% of the CPU (the rest receive 16.5%, 16.5% and 33% of CPU).
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-Note that shares of CPU time are distributed per all CPU cores on multi-core
|
|
|
-systems. Even if a container is limited to less than 100% of CPU time, it
|
|
|
-may use 100% of each individual CPU core. E.g., if we start {C0} container
|
|
|
-with (`-c` = 512) and {C1} with (`-c` = 1024), we start three CPU-intensive
|
|
|
-processes (one in {C0} and two in {C1}) on a system with more than three
|
|
|
-cores, might results in the following division of CPU shares:
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
-PID container CPU CPU share
|
|
|
-100 {C0} 0 100% of CPU0
|
|
|
-101 {C1} 1 100% of CPU1
|
|
|
-102 {C1} 2 100% of CPU2
|
|
|
+### CPU share constraint
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+By default, all containers get the same proportion of CPU cycles. This proportion
|
|
|
+can be modified by changing the container's CPU share weighting relative
|
|
|
+to the weighting of all other running containers.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+To modify the proportion from the default of 1024, use the `-c` or `--cpu-shares`
|
|
|
+flag to set the weighting to 2 or higher.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+The proportion will only apply when CPU-intensive processes are running.
|
|
|
+When tasks in one container are idle, other containers can use the
|
|
|
+left-over CPU time. The actual amount of CPU time will vary depending on
|
|
|
+the number of containers running on the system.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+For example, consider three containers, one has a cpu-share of 1024 and
|
|
|
+two others have a cpu-share setting of 512. When processes in all three
|
|
|
+containers attempt to use 100% of CPU, the first container would receive
|
|
|
+50% of the total CPU time. If you add a fouth container with a cpu-share
|
|
|
+of 1024, the first container only gets 33% of the CPU. The remaining containers
|
|
|
+receive 16.5%, 16.5% and 33% of the CPU.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+On a multi-core system, the shares of CPU time are distributed over all CPU
|
|
|
+cores. Even if a container is limited to less than 100% of CPU time, it can
|
|
|
+use 100% of each individual CPU core.
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+For example, consider a system with more than three cores. If you start one
|
|
|
+container `{C0}` with `-c=512` running one process, and another container
|
|
|
+`{C1}` with `-c=1024` running two processes, this can result in the following
|
|
|
+division of CPU shares:
|
|
|
+
|
|
|
+ PID container CPU CPU share
|
|
|
+ 100 {C0} 0 100% of CPU0
|
|
|
+ 101 {C1} 1 100% of CPU1
|
|
|
+ 102 {C1} 2 100% of CPU2
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Runtime privilege, Linux capabilities, and LXC configuration
|
|
|
|