ladybird/Userland/Libraries/LibJS/Tests/builtins/Function/Function.js
Linus Groh e8519156bc LibJS: Implement create_dynamic_function() according to the spec
The three major changes are:

- Parsing parameters, the function body, and then the full assembled
  function source all separately. This is required by the spec, as
  function parameters and body must be valid each on their own, which
  cannot be guaranteed if we only ever parse the full function.
- Returning an ECMAScriptFunctionObject instead of a FunctionExpression
  that needs to be evaluated separately. This vastly simplifies the
  {Async,AsyncGenerator,Generator,}Function constructor implementations.
  Drop '_node' from the function name accordingly.
- The prototype is now determined via GetPrototypeFromConstructor and
  passed to OrdinaryFunctionCreate.
2022-01-16 01:54:48 +01:00

63 lines
2.8 KiB
JavaScript

describe("correct behavior", () => {
test("constructor properties", () => {
expect(Function).toHaveLength(1);
expect(Function.name).toBe("Function");
expect(Function.prototype).toHaveLength(0);
expect(Function.prototype.name).toBe("");
});
test("typeof", () => {
expect(typeof Function()).toBe("function");
expect(typeof new Function()).toBe("function");
});
test("basic functionality", () => {
expect(Function()()).toBeUndefined();
expect(new Function()()).toBeUndefined();
expect(Function("return 42")()).toBe(42);
expect(new Function("return 42")()).toBe(42);
expect(new Function("foo", "return foo")(42)).toBe(42);
expect(new Function("foo,bar", "return foo + bar")(1, 2)).toBe(3);
expect(new Function("foo", "bar", "return foo + bar")(1, 2)).toBe(3);
expect(new Function("foo", "bar,baz", "return foo + bar + baz")(1, 2, 3)).toBe(6);
expect(new Function("foo", "bar", "baz", "return foo + bar + baz")(1, 2, 3)).toBe(6);
expect(new Function("foo", "if (foo) { return 42; } else { return 'bar'; }")(true)).toBe(
42
);
expect(new Function("foo", "if (foo) { return 42; } else { return 'bar'; }")(false)).toBe(
"bar"
);
expect(new Function("return typeof Function()")()).toBe("function");
expect(new Function("x", "return function (y) { return x + y };")(1)(2)).toBe(3);
expect(new Function("-->")()).toBeUndefined();
expect(new Function().name).toBe("anonymous");
expect(new Function().toString()).toBe("function anonymous() {\n ???\n}");
});
});
describe("errors", () => {
test("syntax error", () => {
expect(() => {
new Function("[");
})
// This might be confusing at first but keep in mind it's actually parsing
// function anonymous() { [ }
// Since the body, surrounded by a newline on each side, is first parsed standalone,
// we report unexpected token EOF instead of }.
// FIXME: The position is odd though, I'd expect `line: 2, column: 2` and `line: 3, column: 1`...
// > eval("\n[") // Uncaught exception: [SyntaxError] Unexpected token Eof. Expected BracketClose (line: 2, column: 2)
// > eval("\n[\n") // Uncaught exception: [SyntaxError] Unexpected token Eof. Expected BracketClose (line: 2, column: 3)
.toThrowWithMessage(
SyntaxError,
"Unexpected token Eof. Expected BracketClose (line: 2, column: 3)"
);
});
test("parameters and body must be valid standalone", () => {
expect(() => {
new Function("/*", "*/ ) {");
}).toThrowWithMessage(SyntaxError, "Unterminated multi-line comment (line: 1, column: 3)");
});
});