
Currently, we get the following results
-1 - -2 = -1
-2 - -1 = 1
Correct would be:
-1 - -2 = 1
-2 - -1 = -1
This was already attempted to be fixed in 7ed8970
, but that change was
incorrect. This directly translates to LibJS BigInts having the same
incorrect behavior - it even was tested.
8 lines
220 B
JavaScript
8 lines
220 B
JavaScript
describe("minus behavior", () => {
|
|
test("the basics", () => {
|
|
expect(3n - 4n).toBe(-1n);
|
|
expect(3n - -4n).toBe(7n);
|
|
expect(-3n - -4n).toBe(1n);
|
|
expect(-3n - 4n).toBe(-7n);
|
|
});
|
|
});
|