
This currently uses a gross hack where it subtracts 11px from the previous sibling bottom to calculate its top. This should be fixed by switching to a proper two-phase line layouting model, were we first distribute inline elements into lines and figure out their horizontal positions and heights; then compute the needed line heights and position inline elements there vertically.
37 lines
1.2 KiB
C++
37 lines
1.2 KiB
C++
#include <LibHTML/DOM/Element.h>
|
|
#include <LibHTML/Layout/LayoutInline.h>
|
|
|
|
LayoutInline::LayoutInline(const Node& node, StyleProperties&& style_properties)
|
|
: LayoutNode(&node, move(style_properties))
|
|
{
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
LayoutInline::~LayoutInline()
|
|
{
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void LayoutInline::layout()
|
|
{
|
|
Point origin;
|
|
|
|
if (previous_sibling() != nullptr) {
|
|
auto& previous_sibling_rect = previous_sibling()->rect();
|
|
auto& previous_sibling_style = previous_sibling()->style();
|
|
origin = previous_sibling_rect.location();
|
|
// FIXME: Implement proper inline positioning when
|
|
// there are nodes with different heights. And don't
|
|
// hardcode font size like we do here.
|
|
origin.move_by(previous_sibling_rect.width(), previous_sibling_rect.height());
|
|
origin.move_by(previous_sibling_style.full_margin().right, -11);
|
|
} else {
|
|
origin = parent()->rect().location();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
rect().set_location(origin);
|
|
|
|
for_each_child([&](auto& child) {
|
|
child.layout();
|
|
rect().set_right(child.rect().right() + child.style().full_margin().right);
|
|
rect().set_bottom(child.rect().bottom() + child.style().full_margin().bottom);
|
|
});
|
|
}
|