123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990919293949596979899100101102103104105106107108109110111112113114115116117118119120121122123124125126127128129130131132133134135136137 |
- /*
- * Copyright (c) 2018-2020, Andreas Kling <kling@serenityos.org>
- * Copyright (c) 2021, Max Wipfli <mail@maxwipfli.ch>
- *
- * SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause
- */
- #include <AK/LexicalPath.h>
- #include <AK/StringView.h>
- #include <Kernel/FileSystem/Custody.h>
- #include <Kernel/FileSystem/VirtualFileSystem.h>
- #include <Kernel/Process.h>
- namespace Kernel {
- static void update_intermediate_node_permissions(UnveilNode& root_node, UnveilAccess new_permissions)
- {
- for (auto& entry : root_node.children()) {
- auto& node = static_cast<UnveilNode&>(*entry.value);
- if (node.was_explicitly_unveiled())
- continue;
- node.set_metadata({ node.path(), new_permissions, node.was_explicitly_unveiled() });
- update_intermediate_node_permissions(node, new_permissions);
- }
- }
- KResultOr<FlatPtr> Process::sys$unveil(Userspace<const Syscall::SC_unveil_params*> user_params)
- {
- Syscall::SC_unveil_params params;
- if (!copy_from_user(¶ms, user_params))
- return EFAULT;
- if (!params.path.characters && !params.permissions.characters) {
- m_veil_state = VeilState::Locked;
- return 0;
- }
- if (m_veil_state == VeilState::Locked)
- return EPERM;
- if (!params.path.characters || !params.permissions.characters)
- return EINVAL;
- if (params.permissions.length > 5)
- return EINVAL;
- auto path_or_error = get_syscall_path_argument(params.path);
- if (path_or_error.is_error())
- return path_or_error.error();
- auto& path = *path_or_error.value();
- if (path.is_empty() || !path.view().starts_with('/'))
- return EINVAL;
- auto permissions = copy_string_from_user(params.permissions);
- if (permissions.is_null())
- return EFAULT;
- // Let's work out permissions first...
- unsigned new_permissions = 0;
- for (const char permission : permissions) {
- switch (permission) {
- case 'r':
- new_permissions |= UnveilAccess::Read;
- break;
- case 'w':
- new_permissions |= UnveilAccess::Write;
- break;
- case 'x':
- new_permissions |= UnveilAccess::Execute;
- break;
- case 'c':
- new_permissions |= UnveilAccess::CreateOrRemove;
- break;
- case 'b':
- new_permissions |= UnveilAccess::Browse;
- break;
- default:
- return EINVAL;
- }
- }
- // Now, let's try and resolve the path and obtain custody of the inode on the disk, and if not, bail out with
- // the error from resolve_path_without_veil()
- // However, if the user specified unveil() with "c" permissions, we don't set errno if ENOENT is encountered,
- // because they most likely intend the program to create the file for them later on.
- // If this case is encountered, the parent node of the path is returned and the custody of that inode is used instead.
- RefPtr<Custody> parent_custody; // Parent inode in case of ENOENT
- String new_unveiled_path;
- auto custody_or_error = VFS::the().resolve_path_without_veil(path.view(), root_directory(), &parent_custody);
- if (!custody_or_error.is_error()) {
- new_unveiled_path = custody_or_error.value()->absolute_path();
- } else if (custody_or_error.error() == -ENOENT && parent_custody && (new_permissions & UnveilAccess::CreateOrRemove)) {
- String basename = LexicalPath(path.view()).basename();
- new_unveiled_path = String::formatted("{}/{}", parent_custody->absolute_path(), basename);
- } else {
- // FIXME Should this be EINVAL?
- return custody_or_error.error();
- }
- LexicalPath lexical_path(new_unveiled_path);
- auto it = lexical_path.parts().begin();
- auto& matching_node = m_unveiled_paths.traverse_until_last_accessible_node(it, lexical_path.parts().end());
- if (it.is_end()) {
- // If the path has already been explicitly unveiled, do not allow elevating its permissions.
- if (matching_node.was_explicitly_unveiled()) {
- if (new_permissions & ~matching_node.permissions())
- return EPERM;
- }
- // It is possible that nodes that are "grandchildren" of the matching node have already been unveiled.
- // This means that there may be intermediate nodes between this one and the unveiled "grandchildren"
- // that inherited the current node's previous permissions. Those nodes now need their permissions
- // updated to match the current node.
- if (matching_node.permissions() != new_permissions)
- update_intermediate_node_permissions(matching_node, (UnveilAccess)new_permissions);
- matching_node.set_metadata({ matching_node.path(), (UnveilAccess)new_permissions, true });
- m_veil_state = VeilState::Dropped;
- return 0;
- }
- matching_node.insert(
- it,
- lexical_path.parts().end(),
- { new_unveiled_path, (UnveilAccess)new_permissions, true },
- [](auto& parent, auto& it) -> Optional<UnveilMetadata> {
- auto path = LexicalPath::join(parent.path(), *it).string();
- return UnveilMetadata { path, parent.permissions(), false };
- });
- VERIFY(m_veil_state != VeilState::Locked);
- m_veil_state = VeilState::Dropped;
- return 0;
- }
- }
|