Instead of using plain objects as Iterator records, causes confusion
about the object itself actually being its [[Iterator]] slot, and
requires non-standard type conversion shenanigans fpr the [[NextValue]]
and [[Done]] internal slots, implement a proper Iterator record struct
and use it throughout.
Also annotate the remaining Iterator AOs with spec comments while we're
here.
Since AsyncIteratorClose and IteratorClose differ only in that the async
version awaits the inner value we just implement them with an enum flag
to switch just that behavior.
This one is a bit unusual, so to clarify:
Previously, callers of get_iterator_values() would supply a callback
that would return an IterationDecision, and an enum to indicate whether
iterator_close() should be invoked upon IterationDecision::Break.
Now, use of both those enums is removed, and callers must return an
Optional<Completion>. If a Completion is provided, the iterator will be
closed, and that completion will be returned from get_iterator_values.
Otherwise, once the iterator is exhausted, a default-initialized
Completion will be returned.
As mentioned on Discord earlier, we'll add these to all new functions
going forward - this is the backfill. Reasons:
- It makes you look at the spec, implementing based on MDN or V8
behavior is a no-go
- It makes finding the various functions that are non-compliant easier,
in the future everything should either have such a comment or, if it's
not from the spec at all, a comment explaining why that is the case
- It makes it easier to check whether a certain abstract operation is
implemented in LibJS, not all of them use the same name as the spec.
E.g. RejectPromise() is Promise::reject()
- It makes it easier to reason about vm.arguments(), e.g. when the
function has a rest parameter
- It makes it easier to see whether a certain function is from a
proposal or Annex B
Also:
- Add arguments to all functions and abstract operations that already
had a comment
- Fix some outdated section numbers
- Replace some ecma-international.org URLs with tc39.es
There's no reason at all for this to be a string or to accept arbitrary
values - just because it's displayed as strings in the spec doesn't mean
we have to do the same :^)
SPDX License Identifiers are a more compact / standardized
way of representing file license information.
See: https://spdx.dev/resources/use/#identifiers
This was done with the `ambr` search and replace tool.
ambr --no-parent-ignore --key-from-file --rep-from-file key.txt rep.txt *
