parse_a_n_plus_b_pattern()'s job is to parse as much of the TokenStream
as it can as a An+B, and then stop. The caller can then deal with any
trailing tokens as it wishes.
...using a ParseErrorOr type alias.
This lets us replace a bunch of manual error-checking with TRY. :^)
I also replaced the ParsingResult::Done value with returning an
Optional. I wasn't happy with treating "Done" as an error when I first
wrote this, and this makes a clear distinction between the two.
The spec grammar for `text-decoration-line` is:
`none | [ underline || overline || line-through || blink ]`
Which means that it's either `none`, or any combination of the other
values. This patch makes that parse for `text-decoration-line` and
`text-decoration`, stores the results as a Vector, and adjusts
`paint_text_decoration()` to run as a loop over all the values that are
provided.
As noted, storing a Vector of values is a bit wasteful, as they could be
stored as flags in a single `u8`. But I was getting too confused trying
to do that in a nice way.
As before, this requires deviating from the spec slightly to create the
StyleRule fully-formed instead of creating it empty and then modifying
its internals.
This means deviating slightly from the spec in order to construct a
fully-initialized Declaration instead of creating an empty one and then
poking at its internals.
DeclarationOrAtRule should probably use a Variant, but for now, making
its Declaration member optional is quick and easy.
This means deviating a little from the spec, so that we create a
complete Block in one go instead of creating an empty one and then
poking at its internals.
The goal here is to move the parser-internal classes into this namespace
so they can have more convenient names without causing collisions. The
Parser itself won't collide, and would be more convenient to just
remain `CSS::Parser`, but having a namespace and a class with the same
name makes C++ unhappy.
This is used to skip downloading fonts in formats that we don't support.
Currently we only support TTF as far as I am aware.
The parts of a `src` are in a fixed order, unusually, which makes the
parsing more nesty instead of loopy.
Like, An+B, this is an old construct that does not fit well with modern
CSS syntax, so things get a bit hairy! We have to determine which
tokens match the grammar for `<urange>`, then turn those back into a
string, and then parse the string differently from normal. Thankfully
the spec describes in detail how to do that. :^)
This is not 100% correct, since we are not using the original source
text (referred to in the spec as the "representation") of the tokens,
but just converting them to strings in a manual, ad-hoc way.
Re-engineering the Tokenizer to keep that original text was too much of
a tangent for today. In any case, we do parse `U+4???`, `U+0-100`,
`U+1234`, and similar, so good enough for now!
"Component value" is the term used in the spec, and it doesn't conflict
with any other types, so let's use the shorter name. :^)
Also, this doesn't need to be friends with the Parser any more.
We're calling this in a way that is incorrect, and so the algorithm's
assumption that the next token is an `<ident-token>` is wrong, and we
have to handle that failing. Ideally we would just stop calling this
incorrectly, but until then, let's actually document what is happening.
The code had to change a bit to match. Previously, we appended an empty
sub-list immediately, but now we append it at the end. The difference
is that if there are no tokens, we now correctly return an empty
list-of-lists, instead of a list containing an empty list.
We now correctly call convert_to_rule() outside of this function.
As before, I've renamed `parse_as_rule()` -> `parse_as_css_rule()` to
match the free function that calls it.
This is not actually used by anything currently, but it should be used
for `@media` and other at-rules.
Removed the public parse_as_list_of_rules() because public functions
should be things that outside classes actually need to use.
`parse_a_stylesheet()` should not do any conversion on its rules. This
change corrects that. There are other places where we get this wrong,
but one thing at a time. :^)
