This is a method defined in the WebDriver spec, but requires access to a
bunch of private fields in these classes, so this is implemented in the
same manner as the reset algorithm.
Otherwise, it looks a bit awkward where the cursor position does not
update while the selection is elsewhere.
Note that this requires passing along the raw selection positions from
`set the selection range` to the elements. Otherwise, consider what will
happen if we set the selection start and end to the same value. By going
through the API accessor, we hit the case where the start and end are
the same value, and return the document cursor position. This would mean
the cursor position would not be updated.
The test changes here more closely match what Firefox produces now. It
is not a 100% match; the `select event fired` test case isn't right. The
problem is the event fires for the input element, but we most recently
focused the textarea element. Thus, when we retrieve the selection from
the input element, we return the document's cursor position, which is
actually in the textarea element. The fix will ultimately be to fully
implement the following:
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/form-control-infrastructure.html#concept-textarea/input-cursor
That is, each input / textarea element should separately track its own
text cursor position.
For both types of elements, `.selectionStart`, `.selectionEnd`,
`.selectionDirection`, `.setSelectionRange()`, `.select()` and the
`select` event are now implemented.
Now that the implementation is in FormAssociatedElement, the
implementation in HTMLInputElement is effectively just a passthrough,
with some minor differences to handle small behavioural quirks between
the two (such as the difference in nullability of types).
When an element with an ID is added to or removed from the DOM, or if
an ID is added, removed, or changed, then we must reset the form owner
of all form-associated elements who have a form attribute.
We do this in 2 steps, using the DOM document as the messenger to handle
these changes:
1. All form-associated elements with a form attribute are stored on the
document. If the form attribute is removed, the element is removed
from that list as well.
2. When a DOM element with an ID undergoes any of the aforementioned
changes, it notifies the document of the change. The document then
forwards that change to the stored form-associated elements.
And dealing with the fallout of doing so. I am not 100% sure that it is
safe for us to be treating Strings in the value sanitization algorithm
in all cases as if they are ASCII, but this commit does not change any
existing behaviour there.
In particular:
- Don't include none submitter buttons.
- Use type_state() instead type() to avoid direct string comparisons
- Support the hidden _charset_ input
- Get form associated element's value directly instead of via the value
attribute
- Split line break normalization into a separate function so that it
can also be used by form submission.
HTMLObjectElement will need to be both a FormAssociatedElement and a
BrowsingContextContainer. Currently, both of these classes inherit from
HTMLElement. This can work in C++, but is generally frowned upon, and
doesn't play particularly well with the rest of LibWeb.
Instead, we can essentially revert commit 3bb5c62 to remove HTMLElement
from FormAssociatedElement's hierarchy. This means that objects such as
HTMLObjectElement individually inherit from FormAssociatedElement and
HTMLElement now.
Some caveats are:
* FormAssociatedElement still needs to know when the HTMLElement is
inserted into and removed from the DOM. This hook is automatically
injected via a macro now, while still allowing classes like
HTMLInputElement to also know when the element is inserted.
* Casting from a DOM::Element to a FormAssociatedElement is now a
sideways cast, rather than directly following an inheritance chain.
This means static_cast cannot be used here; but we can safely use
dynamic_cast since the only 2 instances of this already use RTTI to
verify the cast.
This makes it available for all form associated elements and not just
select and input elements. It also makes it more spec compliant,
especially around the form attribute.
The main thing missing is re-associating form elements with a form
attribute when the form attribute changes or an element with an ID
is inserted/removed or has its ID changed.
The new event target implementation requires us to downcast an
EventTarget to a FormAssociatedElement to check if the current Element
EventTarget has a form owner to setup a with scope for the form owner.
This also makes all form associated elements inherit from
FormAssociatedElement where it was previously missing.
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#form-associated-element
SPDX License Identifiers are a more compact / standardized
way of representing file license information.
See: https://spdx.dev/resources/use/#identifiers
This was done with the `ambr` search and replace tool.
ambr --no-parent-ignore --key-from-file --rep-from-file key.txt rep.txt *
HTMLInputElement now inherits from FormAssociatedElement, which will
be a common base for the handful of elements that need to track their
owner form (and register with it for the form.elements collection.)
At the moment, the owner form is assigned during DOM insertion/removal
of an HTMLInputElement. I didn't implement any of the legacy behaviors
defined by the HTML parsing spec yet.
