Until now, we've been treating the bottom of every line box fragment as
its baseline, and just aligning all the bottoms to the bottom of the
line box. That gave decent results in many cases, but was not correct.
This patch starts moving towards actual baseline calculations as
specified by CSS2.
Note that once layout is finished with a line box, we also store the
baseline of the line box in LineBox::m_baseline. This allows us to align
the real baseline of display:inline-block elements with other inline
content on the same line.
Previously we were computing the bottom edge of a line box by finding
the bottommost fragment on the line.
That method didn't give correct results for line boxes with no fragments
(which is exactly what you get when inserting a bunch of <br> elements.)
To cover all situations, we now keep track of the bottommost edge in the
LineBox object itself.
This property represents the CSS content size, so let's reduce ambiguity
by using the spec terminology.
We also bring a bunch of related functions along for the ride.
The main thing missing is that we don't serialize the supports clause,
but for actually using a `@supports (something: cool) {}` rule in CSS,
it works!
There's a subtle difference here. A "block box" in the spec is a
block-level box, while a "block container" is a box whose children are
either all inline-level boxes in an IFC, or all block-level boxes
participating in a BFC.
Notably, an "inline-block" box is a "block container" but not a "block
box" since it is itself inline-level.
Until now, we've internally thought of the CSS "display" property as a
single-value property. In practice, "display" is a much more complex
property that comes in a number of configurations.
The most interesting one is the two-part format that describes the
outside and inside behavior of a box. Switching our own internal
representation towards this model will allow for much cleaner
abstractions around layout and the various formatting contexts.
Note that we don't *parse* two-part "display" yet, this is only about
changing the internal representation of the property.
Spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display
This patch moves the CSS property+value storage down to a new subclass
of CSSStyleDeclaration called PropertyOwningCSSStyleDeclaration.
The JavaScript wrapper for CSSStyleDeclaration now calls virtual
functions on the C++ object.
This is preparation for supporting computed style CSSStyleDeclaration
objects which won't have internal property storage, but rather an
internal element pointer. :^)
There were a few calls to the standalone version of dump_tree() inside
the recursive version of dump_tree(), which led to the output getting
jumbled out of order.
- CompoundSelector -> *deleted*
- ComplexSelector -> CompoundSelector
- Relation -> Combinator
Our Selector is really a ComplexSelector, but only the Parser and
SelectorEngine need to know that, so keeping it named Selector makes it
more understandable for users.
Our CompoundSelector is really a CompoundSelectorAndCombinator.
Combining the two makes sense in our codebase, but the accurate name is
so long that I think it makes the code less readable.
Renamed some Combinators to also match the spec terminology:
- AdjacentSibling -> NextSibling
- GeneralSibling -> SubsequentSibling
The previous names are somewhat ambiguous, so hopefully this is clearer.
Rather than parsing the selector every time we want to check it, we
now parse it once at the beginning.
A bonus effect of this is that we now support a selector list in
:not(), instead of just a single selector, though only when using
the new parser.
Same reasoning again! This is the last one.
While I was at it, I added the two remaining CSS2.2 pseudo-elements,
::first-line and ::first-letter. All 4 are handled in the new CSS
parser, including with the compatibility single-colon syntax. I have
not added support to the old parser.
Previously, SimpleSelectors optionally had Attribute-selector data
as well as their main type. Now, they're either one or the other,
which better matches the spec, and makes parsing and matching more
straightforward.
Adds support for the :active pseudo-class for hyperlinks (<a> tags
only).
Also, since it was very similar to :focus and an element having a
focused state was already implemented, I went ahead and implemented
that pseudo-class too, although I cannot come up with a working
example to validate it.
SPDX License Identifiers are a more compact / standardized
way of representing file license information.
See: https://spdx.dev/resources/use/#identifiers
This was done with the `ambr` search and replace tool.
ambr --no-parent-ignore --key-from-file --rep-from-file key.txt rep.txt *
This warning informs of float-to-double conversions. The best solution
seems to be to do math *either* in 32-bit *or* in 64-bit, and only to
cross over when absolutely necessary.
