This wasn't the case for compact patterns, but unit patterns can contain
multiple (up to 2, really) identifiers that must each be recognized by
LibJS.
Each generated NumberFormat object now stores an array of identifiers
parsed. The format pattern itself is encoded with the index into this
array for that identifier, e.g. the compact format string "0K" will
become "{number}{compactIdentifier:0}".
This field is currently used to store the StringView into the compact
name/symbol in the format string. Units will need to store a similar
field, so rename the field to be more generic, and extract the parser
for it.
The compact scale of each formatting rule was precomputed in commit:
be69eae651
Using the formula: compact scale = magnitude - pattern scale
This computation was off-by-one.
For example, consider the format key "10000-count-one", which maps to
"00 thousand" in en-US. What we are really after is the exponent that
best represents the string "thousand" for values greater than 10000
and less than 100000 (the next format key). We were previously doing:
log10(10000) - "00 thousand".count("0") = 2
Which clearly isn't what we want. Instead, if we do:
log10(10000) + 1 - "00 thousand".count("0") = 3
We get the correct exponent for each format key for each locale.
This commit also renames the generated variable from "compact_scale" to
"exponent" to match the terminology used in ECMA-402.
For example, in en-US, the decimal, long compact pattern for numbers
between 10,000 and 100,000 is "00 thousand". In that pattern, "thousand"
is the compact identifier, and the generated format pattern is now
"{number} {compactIdentifier}". This also generates that identifier as
its own field in the NumberFormat structure.
Most locales have a single grouping size (the number of integer digits
to be written before inserting a grouping separator). However some have
a primary and secondary size. We parse the primary size as the size used
for the least significant integer digits, and the secondary size for the
most significant.
In order to implement Intl.NumberFormat.prototype.formatToParts, do not
replace {currency} keys in the format pattern before ECMA-402 tells us
to. Otherwise, the array return by formatToParts will not contain the
expected currency key.
Early replacement was done to avoid resolving the currency display more
than once, as it involves a couple of round trips to search through
LibUnicode data. So this adds a non-standard method to NumberFormat to
do this resolution and cache the result.
Another side effect of this change is that LibUnicode must replace unit
format patterns of the form "{0} {1}" during code generation. These were
previously skipped during code generation because LibJS would just
replace the keys with the currency display at runtime. But now that the
currency display injection is delayed, any {0} or {1} keys in the format
pattern will cause PartitionNumberPattern to abort.
Currencies are a bit strange; the layout of currency data in the CLDR is
not particularly compatible with what ECMA-402 expects. For example, the
currency format in the "en" and "ar" locales for the Latin script are:
en: "¤#,##0.00"
ar: "¤\u00A0#,##0.00"
Note how the "ar" locale has a non-breaking space after the currency
symbol (¤), but "en" does not. This does not mean that this space will
appear in the "ar"-formatted string, nor does it mean that a space won't
appear in the "en"-formatted string. This is a runtime decision based on
the currency display chosen by the user ("$" vs. "USD" vs. "US dollar")
and other rules in the Unicode TR-35 spec.
ECMA-402 shies away from the nuances here with "implementation-defined"
steps. LibUnicode will store the data parsed from the CLDR however it is
presented; making decisions about spacing, etc. will occur at runtime
based on user input.
For example, there isn't a unique set of data for the en-US locale;
rather, it defaults to the data for the en locale. See this commit for
much more detail: 357c97dfa8
These are used when formatting a number as currency with a display
option of "name" (e.g. for USD, the name is "US Dollars" in en-US).
These patterns appear in the CLDR in a different manner than other
number formats that are pluralized. They are of the form "{0} {1}",
therefore do not undergo subpattern replacements.
