Some of these are allocated upon initialization of the intrinsics, and
some lazily, but in neither case the getters actually return a nullptr.
This saves us a whole bunch of pointer dereferences (as NonnullGCPtr has
an `operator T&()`), and also has the interesting side effect of forcing
us to explicitly use the FunctionObject& overload of call(), as passing
a NonnullGCPtr is ambigous - it could implicitly be turned into a Value
_or_ a FunctionObject& (so we have to dereference manually).
This proposal has been merged into the main ECMA-402 spec. See:
https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/commit/4257160
Note this includes some editorial and normative changes made when the
proposal was merged into the main spec, but are not in the proposal spec
itself. In particular, the following AOs were changed:
PartitionNumberRangePattern (normative)
SetNumberFormatDigitOptions (editorial)
Instead of passing the continuously merged initial forbidden token set
(with the new additional forbidden tokens from each parsed secondary
expression) to the next call of parse_secondary_expression(), keep a
copy of the original set and use it as the base for parsing the next
secondary expression.
This bug prevented us from properly parsing the following expression:
```js
0 ?? 0 ? 0 : 0 || 0
```
...due to LogicalExpression with LogicalOp::NullishCoalescing returning
both DoubleAmpersand and DoublePipe in its forbidden token set.
The following correct AST is now generated:
Program
(Children)
ExpressionStatement
ConditionalExpression
(Test)
LogicalExpression
NumericLiteral 0
??
NumericLiteral 0
(Consequent)
NumericLiteral 0
(Alternate)
LogicalExpression
NumericLiteral 0
||
NumericLiteral 0
An alternate solution I explored was only merging the original forbidden
token set with the one of the last parsed secondary expression which is
then passed to match_secondary_expression(); however that led to an
incorrect AST (note the alternate expression):
Program
(Children)
ExpressionStatement
LogicalExpression
ConditionalExpression
(Test)
LogicalExpression
NumericLiteral 0
??
NumericLiteral 0
(Consequent)
NumericLiteral 0
(Alternate)
NumericLiteral 0
||
NumericLiteral 0
Truth be told, I don't know enough about the inner workings of the
parser to fully explain the difference. AFAICT this patch has no
unintended side effects in its current form though.
Fixes#18087.
This is a normative change in the ECMA-402 spec. See:
https://github.com/tc39/ecma402/commit/50eb413
Note that this canonicalization already occurred. As the above commit
alludes to, we parse the rearguard format of the TZDB, so GMT is already
an alias to Etc/GMT. But it doesn't hurt to be explicit here.
