Commit graph

11 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Linus Groh
ba6e4c7ae1 LibJS+LibWeb: Use Object::set_prototype() in more places 2021-10-02 14:53:06 +01:00
davidot
830ea0414c LibJS: Make scoping follow the spec
Before this we used an ad-hoc combination of references and 'variables'
stored in a hashmap. This worked in most cases but is not spec like.
Additionally hoisting, dynamically naming functions and scope analysis
was not done properly.

This patch fixes all of that by:
  - Implement BindingInitialization for destructuring assignment.
  - Implementing a new ScopePusher which tracks the lexical and var
    scoped declarations. This hoists functions to the top level if no
    lexical declaration name overlaps. Furthermore we do checking of
    redeclarations in the ScopePusher now requiring less checks all over
    the place.
  - Add methods for parsing the directives and statement lists instead
    of having that code duplicated in multiple places. This allows
    declarations to pushed to the appropriate scope more easily.
  - Remove the non spec way of storing 'variables' in
    DeclarativeEnvironment and make Reference follow the spec instead of
    checking both the bindings and 'variables'.
  - Remove all scoping related things from the Interpreter. And instead
    use environments as specified by the spec. This also includes fixing
    that NativeFunctions did not produce a valid FunctionEnvironment
    which could cause issues with callbacks and eval. All
    FunctionObjects now have a valid NewFunctionEnvironment
    implementation.
  - Remove execute_statements from Interpreter and instead use
    ASTNode::execute everywhere this simplifies AST.cpp as you no longer
    need to worry about which method to call.
  - Make ScopeNodes setup their own environment. This uses four
    different methods specified by the spec
    {Block, Function, Eval, Global}DeclarationInstantiation with the
    annexB extensions.
  - Implement and use NamedEvaluation where specified.

Additionally there are fixes to things exposed by these changes to eval,
{for, for-in, for-of} loops and assignment.

Finally it also fixes some tests in test-js which where passing before
but not now that we have correct behavior :^).
2021-09-30 08:16:32 +01:00
Linus Groh
8c81c84c18 LibJS: Convert internal_set_prototype_of() to ThrowCompletionOr 2021-09-29 23:49:53 +01:00
Andreas Kling
5855b19ff3 LibJS: Avoid unnecessary HashMap copy in ECMAScriptFunctionObject 2021-09-28 22:32:40 +02:00
Linus Groh
9043041dd3 LibJS: Move [[BoundThis]] and [[BoundArguments]] to BoundFunction 2021-09-25 17:51:30 +02:00
Linus Groh
a08292d76c LibJS: Move has_simple_parameter_list to ECMAScriptFunctionObject 2021-09-25 17:51:30 +02:00
Linus Groh
76eb8fe717 LibJS: Move [[Fields]] to ECMAScriptFunctionObject 2021-09-25 17:51:30 +02:00
Linus Groh
136451c3af LibJS: Move [[HomeObject]] to ECMAScriptFunctionObject 2021-09-25 17:51:30 +02:00
Linus Groh
1e97a85095 LibJS: Move [[ThisMode]] to ECMAScriptFunctionObject 2021-09-25 17:51:30 +02:00
Linus Groh
d5f90cf187 LibJS: Rename ECMAScriptFunctionObject members to match spec names
Also add the internal slot names as comments, and separate them into
groups of spec and non-spec members.
This will make it easier to compare the implementation code with the
spec, as well as identify internal slots currently missing or only
present on FunctionObject.
2021-09-25 17:51:30 +02:00
Linus Groh
e37cf73300 LibJS: Rename OrdinaryFunctionObject to ECMAScriptFunctionObject
The old name is the result of the perhaps somewhat confusingly named
abstract operation OrdinaryFunctionCreate(), which creates an "ordinary
object" (https://tc39.es/ecma262/#ordinary-object) in contrast to an
"exotic object" (https://tc39.es/ecma262/#exotic-object).

However, the term "Ordinary Function" is not used anywhere in the spec,
instead the created object is referred to as an "ECMAScript Function
Object" (https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-ecmascript-function-objects), so
let's call it that.

The "ordinary" vs. "exotic" distinction is important because there are
also "Built-in Function Objects", which can be either implemented as
ordinary ECMAScript function objects, or as exotic objects (our
NativeFunction).

More work needs to be done to move a lot of infrastructure to
ECMAScriptFunctionObject in order to make FunctionObject nothing more
than an interface for objects that implement [[Call]] and optionally
[[Construct]].
2021-09-25 17:51:30 +02:00
Renamed from Userland/Libraries/LibJS/Runtime/OrdinaryFunctionObject.cpp (Browse further)