There's nothing really background-size-specific about this, but since
there is no `<size>` value type defined in the CSS spec at this time,
and background-size is the only user of it, I think this name makes more
sense. But I'm not 100% convinced.
...as opposed to storing StyleValues, which we have to later check are
IdentifierStyleValues, which store identifiers that we can convert to
Repeat values later. It's fewer allocations, and we can't end up with
invalid values by mistake. :^)
This is step 1 in removing the two `background-repeat-x/y`
pseudo-properties. Since adding the concept of compound StyleValues, we
don't need `background-repeat` to be split in two any more.
This is done a bit differently from other properties: using a
TokenStream instead of just a Vector of ComponentValues. The reason for
this is, we can then use call the same function when parsing the
`background` shorthand. Otherwise, we would have to know in advance how
many values to pass down, which basically would involve duplicating the
`background-position` parsing code inside `background`.
The StyleValue is PositionStyleValue, since it represents a
`<position>`: https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#typedef-position
Unfortunately, background-position's parsing is a bit different from
`<position>`'s, (background-position allows 3-value syntax and
`<position>` doesn't) so we'll need to come back and write a different
parsing function for that later.
This always felt awkward to me, and required a few other hacks to make
it work. Now, the request is only started when `load_bitmap()` is
called, which we do inside `NodeWithStyle::apply_style()`.
Until now, we've internally thought of the CSS "display" property as a
single-value property. In practice, "display" is a much more complex
property that comes in a number of configurations.
The most interesting one is the two-part format that describes the
outside and inside behavior of a box. Switching our own internal
representation towards this model will allow for much cleaner
abstractions around layout and the various formatting contexts.
Note that we don't *parse* two-part "display" yet, this is only about
changing the internal representation of the property.
Spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display
When parsing a CSS value in the context of a CSSStyleDeclaration
camelCase property setter, we don't necessarily have a Document to
provide the CSS parser for context.
So the parser can't go assuming that there's always a Document in the
ParsingContext. And ImageStyleValue can't go assuming that there's
always a Document either. This will require some more work to get things
right, I'm just patching up the null dereference for now.
This does a few things, that are hard to separate. For a while now, it's
been confuzing what `StyleValue::is_foo()` actually means. It sometimes
was used to check the type, and sometimes to see if it could return a
certain value type. The new naming scheme is:
- `is_length()` - is it a LengthStyleValue?
- `as_length()` - casts it to LengthStyleValue
- `has_length()` - can it return a Length?
- `to_length()` - gets the internal value out (eg, Length)
This also means, no more `static_cast<LengthStyleValue const&>(*this)`
stuff when dealing with StyleValues. :^)
Hopefully this will be a bit clearer going forward. There are lots of
places using the original methods, so I'll be going through them to
hopefully catch any issues.
Calling `is_identifier()` here was wrong, since it just means you can
get an Identifier from it. This meant that an `auto` LengthStyleValue
would return true, then it would get `static_cast` to the wrong class,
and return a garbage value.
Basically, I really need to tidy up the API for StyleValue, so it's
clear whether `is_foo()` means the object is a `FooStyleValue`, or it
can just return a `foo` value.
For `number` and `integer` types, you can add a range afterwards to add
a range check, using similar syntax to that used in the CSS specs. For
example:
```json
"font-weight": {
...
"valid-types": [
"number [1,1000]"
],
...
}
```
This limits any numbers to the range `1 <= n <= 1000`.
This namespace will be used for all interfaces defined in the URL
specification, like URL and URLSearchParams.
This has the unfortunate side-effect of requiring us to use the fully
qualified AK::URL name whenever we want to refer to the AK class, so
this commit also fixes all such references.
Previously it was returning an "auto" length. This caused all the new
"initial" values to effectively turn into auto values long before layout
had a chance to resolve them.
This broke replaced elements with intrinsic size but no specified width
or height, and is the reason that Mr. ACID2 temporarily lost his eyes.
Apart from now gathering comma-separated font-family names into a
StyleValueList, this also corrects the logic for parsing a single
font-family. Previously, we did not handle unquoted font names at all,
and now they are handled including when they are several words separated
by whitespace.
Modified the logic for `font` to use `parse_font_family_value()`.
`FontStyleValue.font_families()` is now a StyleValueList instead of a
vector, so that it can be better handled in StyleResolver.
We also finally remove the CSS::ParsingContext in
set_property_expanding_shorthands(). :^)
This wraps an x and y background-repeat value. Potentially, we could use
this in place of the background-repeat-x and background-repeat-y
pseudo-properties, but for now StyleResolver splits it into those
properties, like it did before.
This parses the elliptical border-radius values, though currently we
only support circular ones. So, to_length() is overloaded to return the
horizontal-radius. This means the code in Layout/Node.cpp does not need
to change for now.
This is not just moving the code from StyleResolver to Parser. The logic
has changed to allow for the `flex-basis` to come before or after the
`flex-grow/shrink` values, as well as handle the special one-value
cases.
Also added test cases to flex.html to check the parsing. It does parse
correctly, but elements with `flex-basis: auto` do not calculate their
width correctly.
Modified text-decoration.html to better test that the values can be in
any order, and that it adopts the color from the `color` property if no
decoration color is specified. Right now, it always does because we do
not support a different decoration color. Later, we need to support the
`currentcolor` special CSS value for this purpose.
Yes, the name is silly, but it's a StyleValue for list-style, so...
yeah. :^)
Since `list-style-type` and `list-style-image` can both have `none` as a
value, and can appear in any order, we have to handle it separately, and
then assign either or both of those to `none` depending on how many
`none`s there are, and whether those sub-properties already have values.
Added some extra test cases to lists.html to cover list-style-image and
list-style-position parts of the list-style shorthand, and the `none`
values.
This one represents one secton of a `background` property, since it can
have multiple background values separated by commas. Eventually, we will
represent that as a List of BackgroundStyleValues.
Also modified some background-foo properties in StyleResolver so that
the is_background_x() functions could be removed.
I realized that our handling of var() in shorthand properties is wrong,
so have been removing the is_builtin_or_dynamic() calls from the parsing
code for shorthands. This broke our var() test page, so I have replaced
the use of 'background' with 'background-color' there.
After working with the code for a while, it makes more sense to put all
the parsing in Parser, instead of some of it living in StyleResolver.
That means our current ValueListStyleValue needs to be replaced with
specific StyleValue types for the properties that are shorthands or
otherwise combine several values together.
Here we implement FontStyleProperty, which represents a `font` CSS
property.
Also adjusted the fonts.html test page so that font-weights are featured
in test cases without things we do not yet support.
StyleValueList is a list of StyleValues of the same type, for use in
properties like `margin` which accept a variable number of arguments.
I had originally hoped to simply swap the old ValueListStyleValue from
being a list of ComponentValues to one of StyleValues, but I can see now
that I will need to have both for a little while, so renamed the old
is_value_list() to is_component_value_list() temporarily.
