This change is supposed to solve the problem that currenty when grid
tracks are interleaved with gaps it is impossible to iterate tracks
spanned by a specific grid item. There is a pair of functions:
gap_adjusted_row() and gap_adjusted_column() but they won't work
when it comes to items spanning > 1 track.
Separating gaps from tracks is going to make it possible to iterate
just tracks or both tracks and gaps when it is required. And now tracks
spanned by an item can be accessed by just index without doing any
additional math.
When a width/height constraint is applied to GFC it should set its own
width/height to the sum of track sizes according to the spec.
Changes in layout tests are improvement over what we had before.
size_t should be used instead of int in loop counter and to store
rows/columns positions because they can't be negative values.
This allows to remove some static casts to int.
1. Stop using -1 to indicate infinity value of growth limit. Just use
INFINITY for that.
2. More complete implementation of "Expand Flexible Tracks" step.
3. Return AvailableSize from get_free_space: spec says that this
function can return indefinite size and it is ok.
Although the algorithm for sizing tracks (rows or columns) is defined
once for both dimensions in the specification
(https://www.w3.org/TR/css-grid-2/#algo-track-sizing), we have
implemented it twice separately for sizing rows and columns.
In addition to code duplication, another issue is that these
implementations of the same algorithm have already diverged in some
places, and this divergence is likely to become even worse as our
implementation evolves.
This change unifies code for both dimension into one method that runs
track sizing.
While this change brings a bit of collateral damange (border.html and
minmax.html got changes in layout snaphots) it ultimately brings more
benefits because now we can evolve layout for both rows and colums
without duplicating the code :)
Instead of special-casing FlexFormattingContext in the intrinsic sizing
layout helpers, add FormattingContext::automatic_content_width() and let
each context subclass decide what that means.
No behavior change here, just moving this responsibility.
This fixes a bug in the CSS Grid when there is a column and/or row gap,
as previously it would take the index of the incorrect column when
finding the `AvailableSize`.
There is a mild complication in the GridFormattingContext as the
OccupationGrid does not take into account the gap columns and rows that
later appear in the `Vector<TemporaryTrack>` columns and rows. The
PositionedBoxes are kind of a connection between the two, and so it's
now more explicit whether you would like to refer to a column by its
position taking into the gap columns/rows or not.
Grid containers were incorrectly represented as BlockContainer before.
Furthermore, GridFormattingContext had a bogus inheritance relationship
with BlockFormattingContext.
This patch brings our architecture closer to spec by making grid
containers be plain boxes and making GFC not inherit from BFC.
If valid grid-template-areas were given, then place grid items within
these areas. Grid-template-areas take precedence over named line
tracks, meaning if there are grid-areas as well as named tracks, should
use the grid-areas.
When starting the GridFormattingContext, calculate the valid grid areas
as declared in the `grid-template-areas` property. Since this doesn't
change, are able to do this once and store the results.
We have a new, improved string type coming up in AK (OOM aware, no null
state), and while it's going to use UTF-8, the name UTF8String is a
mouthful - so let's free up the String name by renaming the existing
class.
Making the old one have an annoying name will hopefully also help with
quick adoption :^)
Previously were incorrectly initializing the grid gap tracks as were
using the GridSize float constructor, which creates a flexible length.
What is actually wanted is a fixed-size track of a certain size,
indicated in pixels.
Should use AvailableSpace to get the grid width instead of
box_state.content_width().
This change was imposed on me by the compiler as in a future commit I
will remove the only reference to the available_space parameter.
Refactor various classes in the GridTrackSize file for the incoming
named_tracks feature.
Previously the ExplicitTrackSizing had mixed responsiblities with the
newly-named GridRepeat class. This made it so it was not possible to
have multiple repeats within a single 'GridTrackSizeList' definition.
The MetaGridTrackSize class had both the responsibilities of being a
container for minmax values as well as for simple GridSizes. By uniting
the different possible values (repeat, minmax, default) into the
ExplicitGridTrack class are able to be more expressive as to the
different grid size modalities.
The GridTrackSizeList will be useful as compared to a
Vector<ExplicitGridTrack> since this way can keep track of the declared
line names. These same line names are able to be declared within the
values of a repeat function, hence the presence of a GridTrackSizeList
inside the GridRepeat class.
In order to avoid naming conflicts with the many trial-and-error name
changes going on in the GridTrackSize file, rename this to a unique name
that is unlikely to be troublesome.
This is a big and messy change, and here's the gist:
- AvaliableSpace is now 2x AvailableSize (width and height)
- Layout algorithms are redesigned around the idea of available space
- When doing layout across nested formatting contexts, the parent
context tells the child context how much space is available for the
child's root box in both axes.
- "Available space" replaces "containing block width" in most places.
- The width and height in a box's UsedValues are considered to be
definite after they're assigned to. Marking something as having
definite size is no longer a separate step,
This probably introduces various regressions, but the big win here is
that our layout system now works with available space, just like the
specs are written. Fixing issues will be much easier going forward,
since you don't need to do nearly as much conversion from "spec logic"
to "LibWeb logic" as you previously did.
Instead of formatting contexts flailing around to figure out from the
"inside" how much space is available on the "outside", we should
provide the amount of available space in both axes as an input to run().
This basically means that when something creates a nested formatting
context, the parent context is responsible for telling the nested context
how much space is available for layout. This information is provided
immediately when invoking run().
Note that this commit doesn't pass accurate values in all cases yet.
This first step just makes it build, and passes available values in some
cases where getting them was trivial.
This function should return the automatic height of the formatting
context's root box.
Until now, we've been relying on some magical handshakes between parent
and child context, when negotiating the height of child context root
boxes. This is a step towards something more reasonable.
