These changes are compatible with clang-format 16 and will be mandatory
when we eventually bump clang-format version. So, since there are no
real downsides, let's commit them now.
This line changes padding top to align cell content to baseline:
`cell.padding_top += m_rows[cell.row_index].baseline - cell.baseline`
Which means available for distribution height `height_diff` could have
changed so it needs to be refreshed before assigning the rest of it to
padding bottom:
`cell_state.padding_bottom += height_diff;`
Fixes https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/issues/22032
There is no need to run full table layout if we are only interested in
calculating its width.
This change reduces compute_table_box_width_inside_table_wrapper()
from ~30% to ~15% in profiles of "File changed" pages on github.
In a bunch of cases, this actually ends up simplifying the code as
to_number will handle something such as:
```
Optional<I> opt;
if constexpr (IsSigned<I>)
opt = view.to_int<I>();
else
opt = view.to_uint<I>();
```
For us.
The main goal here however is to have a single generic number conversion
API between all of the String classes.
This should allow us to add a Element::attribute which returns an
Optional<String>. Eventually all callers should be ported to switch from
the DeprecatedString version, but in the meantime, this should allow us
to port some more IDL interfaces away from DeprecatedString.
Since we always pass the px value as an argument to resolved(), we can
pass it directly as CSSPixels instead of wrapping it in Length. This
approach allows us to avoid converting to a double, resulting in fewer
precision issues.
If the table used width has to be adjusted because of a cell with
percentage width, add back the undistributable space due to border
spacing. This is consistent with the width distribution algorithm, which
sets aside the undistributable space and the behavior of other browsers.
This is intended to annotate conversions from unknown floating-point
values to CSSPixels, and make it more obvious the fp value will be
rounded to the nearest fixed-point value.
In general it is not safe to convert any arbitrary floating-point value
to CSSPixels. CSSPixels has a resolution of 0.015625, which for small
values (e.g. scale factors between 0 and 1), can produce bad results
if converted to CSSPixels then scaled back up. In the worst case values
can underflow to zero and produce incorrect results.
Changing `calculate_min_content_heigh()` and
`calculate_min_content_heigh()` to accept width as `CSSPixels`, instead
of `AvailableSize` that might be indefinite, makes it more explicit
that width is supposed to be known by the time height is measured.
This change has a bit of collateral damage which is rows height
calculation regression in `table/inline-table-width` that worked before
by accident.
Using avilable space directly while resolving table container width
allows to avoid assigning it to table wrapper box content width which
sometimes involves infinite (saturated) values.
Also this allows to get rid of set_max_content_width() which is a hack
that allows to bypass set_content_width() to assign infinite
(saturated) width to a box.
Closes https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/issues/19521
Use the max-width of percentage cells instead of min-width as the
reference to be used to compute the total table width. The specification
only suggests that the UA should try to satisfy percentage constraints
and this behavior is more consistent with other browsers.
For malformed tables which only have cells with span greater than 1, the
content sizes for row and column aren't initialized to non-zero values.
Avoid undefined behavior in such cases, which sometimes show up on
Wikipedia.
Follow the computing column measures section of the specification, which
gives an algorithm for setting intrinsic percentage widths when spanning
columns are involved.
Change how we store type of columns. It was used where the specification
only distinguishes between percent and everything else, so it makes more
sense to store and use it as a boolean.
Make used widths of the columns a linear combination of two consecutive
sizing-guesses when the assignable table width is less than or equal to
the max-content sizing-guess, as the specification describes.
The specification says we should distribute excess width proportionally
to the width of the cell, not to the preferred increment. Doing the
latter leads to distributing all excess width to just the cells which
demand some increment, even if it's very modest. Moreover, there's code
which partially implements the correct criteria just below the one we
remove here.
Max width shouldn't be tied to min width, commit d33b99d went too far
and made them the same when the table-root had a specified percentage
width.
Fixes#19940.
