If a box has definite width and a preferred aspect ratio, we can
determine its height without performing layout. Hence, its height should
also be considered definite. And the other way around for width from
height as well.
Before this change, we were not detaching paintables from DOM nodes
within shadow subtrees.
This appears to be the main reason that keyboard editing was doing
immediate forced relayout: doing a full layout invalidation meant we'd
build a new layout tree, which then hid the problem with with
still-attached paintables.
By detaching them before committing a new layout, we make it possible
for keyboard editing to just use normal relayout, instead of full forced
invalidation & relayout.
If the layout has been recalculated and the sizes of scrollable
overflow rectangles could have changed, we need to ensure that scroll
offsets remain within the valid range.
Height definiteness is now preserved as intended by CSS-SIZING-3
(assuming I've understood it correctly) and not implicitly granted by
layout algorithms when they assign height.
For the specific special/magical cases where some sizes become definite
during layout, the preceding commits have made them explicit in code.
This fixes a number of flex layout issues where we were previously
resolving percentage values against post-layout flex container heights,
but other browsers don't.
Fixing this function will be quite an undertaking since a *lot* of code
relies on set_content_width() implicitly flipping the definiteness of
the width. It is wrong though, so we do need to fix it eventually.
Recently, we moved the resolution of CSS properties that do not affect
layout to occur within LayoutState::commit(). This decision was a
mistake as it breaks invalidation. With this change, we now re-resolve
all properties that do not affect layout before each repaint.
We don't currently calculate the fill- or stroke-boxes of SVG elements,
so for now we use the content- and border-boxes respectively, as those
are the closest equivalents. The test will need updating when we do
support them.
Also, the test is a screenshot because of rendering differences when
applying transforms: a 20px box does not get painted the same as a 10px
box scaled up 2x. Otherwise that would be the more ideal form of test.
Step 5 of parsing was always skipped because step 4 continues.
Running step 5 causes some of the denominators to be 0 and causes
divide by zero error in CSSPixelFraction.
SVG Image with height of 0 will cause divide by zero error when
calculating intrinsic aspect ratio of SVGDecoderImageData.
We also get a divide by zero error in AlignContent::SpaceBetween of the
FlexFormatingContext.
During auto track stretching in GridFormatingContext there is a
possibility for count_of_auto_max_sizing_tracks to stay 0.
Prior to this change, we iterated through all fragments within each
PaintableWithLines to resolve the relative position offset. This
happened before transferring the fragments to their corresponding
inline paintables.
With this change, we significantly reduce amount of work by attempting
to resolve relative position offsets only for those contained within
inline paintables.
Performance improvement on https://html.spec.whatwg.org/
Now, instead of resolving "transform" and "transform-origin" during the
construction of the stacking context tree, we do so during the layout
commit.
This is part of a refactoring effort to make the paintable tree
independent from the layout tree.
The paintable tree structure more closely matches the painting order
when fragments are owned by corresponding inline paintables. This
change does not affect the layout tree, as it is more convenient for
layout purposes to have all fragments owned by a block container in
one place.
Additionally, this improves performance significantly on pages with
many fragments, as we no longer have to walk the ancestor chain up
to the closest block container to determine if a fragment belongs
to an inline paintable.
Instead of trying to be clever and detaching the paint tree lazily,
just detach all paintables from both DOM and layout tree when building
and committing respectively.
Rather than resolving the text-shadow each time painting commands are
recorded, we can resolve it once during the layout commit and save the
resolved values in paintable fragments. This is also step towards
getting rid of layout node pointer in paintable fragment.
This is a part of refactoring towards making the paintable tree
independent of the layout tree. Now, instead of transferring text
fragments from the layout tree to the paintable tree during the layout
commit phase, we allocate separate PaintableFragments that contain only
the information necessary for painting. Doing this also allows us to
get rid LineBoxes, as they are used only during layout.
Fragments contained by the inline node should be painted in the
foreground phase for this node, instead of being painted as a part of
the containing PaintableWithLines. This change implements that by
marking all fragments contained by inline nodes so they can be skipped
while painting the content of PaintableWithLines. This is an ugly way,
and instead, we should make InlinePaintables own all fragments
contained by them.
This change fixes a problem that we should not call `to_px()` to
resolve any length or percentage values during paintables traversal
because that is supposed to happen while performing layout.
Also it improves performance because before we were resolving border
radii during each painting phase but now it happens only once during
layout.
This makes use of the new Gfx::Path::text() to handle SVG text elements,
with this text is just a regular path, and can be manipulated like any
other graphics element.
This removes the SVGTextPaintable and makes both <text> and geometry
elements use a new (shared) SVGPathPaintable. This is identical to the
old SVGGeometryPaintable. This simplifies painting as once something is
resolved to a Gfx::Path, the painting logic is the same.
Previously, all SVG <text> elements were zero-sized boxes, that were
only actually positioned and sized during painting. This led to a number
of problems, the most visible of which being that text could not be
scaled based on the viewBox.
Which this patch, <text> elements get a correctly sized layout box,
that can be hit-tested and respects the SVG viewBox.
To share code with SVGGeometryElement's the PathData (from the prior
commit) has been split into a computed path and computed transforms.
The computed path is specific to geometry elements, but the computed
transforms are shared between all SVG graphics elements.
This removes the awkward hack to recompute the layout transform at paint
time, and makes it possible for path sizes to be computed during layout.
For example, it's possible to use relative units in SVG shapes (e.g.
<rect>), which can be resolved during layout, but would be hard to
resolve again during painting.
The postitioning enum values are used by the position CSS property.
Unfortunately, the prior naming clashes with the CSS Values-4 type
named position, which will be implemented in a later commit.
This allows SVG mask elements to have layout computed, but not connected
to the main paint tree. They should only be reachable if (and painted)
if referenced by the "mask" attribute of another element.
This is controlled by the forms_unconnected_subtree() function on the
paintable, which (if it returns true) prevents the paintable from being
added as a child to what would be its parent.
A Paintable is not created for an SVG <defs> element (nor should it),
but it can contain SVG <mask> elements that need a paintable.
This change forces those paintables to be created (without a parent).
The masks are then only painted by being referenced from another
element.
Since we always pass the px value as an argument to resolved(), we can
pass it directly as CSSPixels instead of wrapping it in Length. This
approach allows us to avoid converting to a double, resulting in fewer
precision issues.
When text paintables shift around in the tree due to line wrapping,
we may end up in a situation where some text node does not generate
a paintable (due to being all whitespace, for example), even though
in the previous layout pass, it *did* generate a paintable.
To prevent holding on to old paintables in such cases, we now do a
pass in LayoutState::commit() where we explicitly detach all old
paintables from the layout tree.
In general it is not safe to convert any arbitrary floating-point value
to CSSPixels. CSSPixels has a resolution of 0.015625, which for small
values (e.g. scale factors between 0 and 1), can produce bad results
if converted to CSSPixels then scaled back up. In the worst case values
can underflow to zero and produce incorrect results.
Until now, paint trees have been piggybacking on the layout tree for
traversal, and paintables didn't actually have their own parent/child
pointers.
This patch changes that by making Paintable inherit from TreeNode, and
adding a new pass to LayoutState::commit() where we recursively build
the new paint tree.
Instead of applying relative offsets (like position:relative insets)
during painting and hit testing, we now do a pass at the end of layout
and assign the final resolved offsets to paintables.
This makes painting and hit testing easier since they don't have to
think about relative offsets, and it also fixes a bug where offsets were
not applied to text fragments inside inline-flow elements that were
themselves position:relative.
Using avilable space directly while resolving table container width
allows to avoid assigning it to table wrapper box content width which
sometimes involves infinite (saturated) values.
Also this allows to get rid of set_max_content_width() which is a hack
that allows to bypass set_content_width() to assign infinite
(saturated) width to a box.
Closes https://github.com/SerenityOS/serenity/issues/19521
The `clip_shrink` optimization in `paint_background()` now also
correctly uses DevicePixels, instead of reducing a DevicePixel rect by
a CSSPixels amount.
Checking if CSSPixels contains a finite value is no longer makes sense
after converting to fixed-point arithmetics. Instead there should
assertion that used value is not saturated.
Importantly, we now only consider overflow from descendants with
explicltly visible overflow, and only from descendants that have the
measured box as their containing block.
Also, we now measure scrollable overflow for all boxes, not just scroll
containers. This will allow us to fix a long-standing paint problem in
the next commit.
This fixes the issue when size of abspos items is considered to be
resolvable without performing layout which is not correct in the
scenarious when top/right/bottom/left properties are not auto.
