This is a monster patch that turns all EventTargets into GC-allocated
PlatformObjects. Their C++ wrapper classes are removed, and the LibJS
garbage collector is now responsible for their lifetimes.
There's a fair amount of hacks and band-aids in this patch, and we'll
have a lot of cleanup to do after this.
Each of these strings would previously rely on StringView's char const*
constructor overload, which would call __builtin_strlen on the string.
Since we now have operator ""sv, we can replace these with much simpler
versions. This opens the door to being able to remove
StringView(char const*).
No functional changes.
This improves our spec compliance by allowing the user to click
non-element nodes (like text) and having the click be registered with
the parent element (like a div or button). This makes Fandom's cookie
accept button work if you click the text. Additionally, the events test
page contains a test to check the target element, which would previously
not exist when we fired the event at a non-element.
The WebView url wouldn't update so reload in Tab would still use the
previous URL before any left click navigation.
I am unsure if there was any good reason not to dispatch the event when
there are no modifiers.
This commit moves a couple more special cases in mouse event handling to
handle_mouseup. Additionally, it gets rid of the special casing with
should_dispatch_event and only fires a click event to the EventTarget
when the left mouse button is clicked. Finally it restores the link
context menu callback that was lost during 0fc8c65.
This commit moves the regular handling of links to the anchor elements'
activation behavior, and implements a few auxiliary algorithms as
defined by the HTML specification.
Note that certain things such as javascript links, fragments and opening
a new tab are still handled directly in EventHandler, but they have been
moved to handle_mouseup so that it behaves closer to how it would if it
was entirely up-to-spec.
This is a convenience accessor to avoid having to say this everywhere:
result.paintable->layout_node().dom_node()
Instead, you can now do:
result.dom_node()
This commit is messy due to the Paintable and Layout classes being
tangled together.
The RadioButton, CheckBox and ButtonBox classes are now subclasses of
FormAssociatedLabelableNode. This subclass separates these layout nodes
from LabelableNode, which is also the superclass of non-form associated
labelable nodes (Progress).
ButtonPaintable, CheckBoxPaintable and RadioButtonPaintable no longer
call events on DOM nodes directly from their mouse event handlers;
instead, all the functionality is now directly in EventHandler, which
dispatches the related events. handle_mousedown and related methods
return a bool indicating whether the event handling should proceed.
Paintable classes can now return an alternative DOM::Node which should
be the target of the mouse event. Labels use this to indicate that the
labeled control should be the target of the mouse events.
HTMLInputElement put its activation behavior on run_activation_behavior,
which wasn't actually called anywhere and had to be manually called by
other places. We now use activation_behavior which is used by
EventDispatcher.
This commit also brings HTMLInputElement closer to spec by removing the
did_foo functions that did ad-hoc event dispatching and unifies the
behavior under run_input_activation_behavior.
Everything related to hit testing is better off using the painting tree.
The thing being mousemoved over is a paintable, so let's hand that out
directly instead of the corresponding layout node.
Input events have nothing to do with layout, so let's not send them to
layout nodes.
The job of Paintable starts to become clear. It represents a paintable
item that can be rendered into the viewport, which means it can also
be targeted by the mouse cursor.
If the mousedown event hits something with is_focusable()==true,
we now update the document's focused element *instead* of placing the
text cursor at the focusable element.
This allows you to begin editing input elements by clicking them.
This feels very hackish and we'll need to come up with something nicer.
