This class had slightly confusing semantics and the added weirdness
doesn't seem worth it just so we can say "." instead of "->" when
iterating over a vector of NNRPs.
This patch replaces NonnullRefPtrVector<T> with Vector<NNRP<T>>.
Like the name suggests this pointer type compares its pointees by value
rather than just by the pointer. This is needed for the defaulted
struct Properties equality operator.
This commit also contains a few changes to StyleValue such as replacing
the operator==()s with a .equals() again. This is done to avoid the new
reversed operator==()s ambiguity in C++20.
DeprecatedFlyString relies heavily on DeprecatedString's StringImpl, so
let's rename it to A) match the name of DeprecatedString, B) write a new
FlyString class that is tied to String.
This will make it easier to support both string types at the same time
while we convert code, and tracking down remaining uses.
One big exception is Value::to_string() in LibJS, where the name is
dictated by the ToString AO.
We have a new, improved string type coming up in AK (OOM aware, no null
state), and while it's going to use UTF-8, the name UTF8String is a
mouthful - so let's free up the String name by renaming the existing
class.
Making the old one have an annoying name will hopefully also help with
quick adoption :^)
Prevent media query parser from falling back into
MediaQuery::create_not_all() for queries with unknown media type.
With this change following test works correctly:
http://wpt.live/css/css-conditional/at-media-001.html
This parses conic-gradient()s while also attempting to share the bulk
of the parsing code with linear-gradient()s. This is done by extracting
the <color-stop-list> parsing to a "fill in the blacks" generic
function. This is a little awkward but cuts down on a lot of copy
pasting of code.
This parses <position> according to the following grammer:
<position> = [
[ left | center | right ] || [ top | center | bottom ]
|
[ left | center | right | <length-percentage> ]
[ top | center | bottom | <length-percentage> ]?
|
[ [ left | right ] <length-percentage> ] &&
[ [ top | bottom ] <length-percentage> ]
]
The code is a little hairy and simply tries each alternative in turn,
manually checking the possible orders. There may be a better way to
represent this.
