https://www.w3.org/TR/cssom/ is the more permanent home of the CSSOM
specification's latest version, and is up to date with the draft spec.
Also, https://drafts.csswg.org/ has been down multiple times recently
which made looking things up a pain.
Until now, we've internally thought of the CSS "display" property as a
single-value property. In practice, "display" is a much more complex
property that comes in a number of configurations.
The most interesting one is the two-part format that describes the
outside and inside behavior of a box. Switching our own internal
representation towards this model will allow for much cleaner
abstractions around layout and the various formatting contexts.
Note that we don't *parse* two-part "display" yet, this is only about
changing the internal representation of the property.
Spec: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-display
If the specified value for these properties is "none", we end up storing
it as an "undefined" CSS::Length in the computed values.
We need to convert it back into "none" for getComputedStyle().
There are a handful of FIXME's here, but this seems generally good.
Note that CSS *values* don't get serialized in a spec-compliant way
since we currently rely on StyleValue::to_string() which is ad-hoc.
Resolved style is a spec concept that refers to the weird mix of
computed style and used style reflected by getComputedStyle().
The purpose of this class is to produce the *computed* style for a given
element, so let's call it StyleComputer.
The original name was based on the window.getComputedStyle() API.
However, "Computed" in "getComputedStyle" is actually a misnomer that
the platform is stuck with due to backwards compatibility.
What getComputedStyle() returns is actually a mix of computed and used
values. The spec calls it the "resolved" values. So let's call this
declaration subclass "ResolvedCSSStyleDeclaration" to match.
