From https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-4/#background-clip
"The background is painted within (clipped to) the intersection of the
border box and the geometry of the text in the element and its in-flow
and floated descendants"
This change implements it in the following way:
1. Traverse the descendants of the element, collecting the Gfx::Path of
glyphs into a vector.
2. The vector of collected paths is saved in the background painting
command.
3. The painting commands executor uses the list of glyphs to paint a
mask for background clipping.
Co-authored-by: Aliaksandr Kalenik <kalenik.aliaksandr@gmail.com>
This change fixes GC-leak caused by following mutual dependency:
- SVGDecodedImageData owns JS::Handle for Page.
- SVGDecodedImageData is owned by visited objects.
by making everything inherited from HTML::DecodedImageData and
ListOfAvailableImages to be GC-allocated.
Generally, if visited object has a handle, very likely we leak
everything visited from object in a handle.
Before this change, we used Gfx::Bitmap to represent both decoded
images that are not going to be mutated and bitmaps corresponding
to canvases that could be mutated.
This change introduces a wrapper for bitmaps that are not going to be
mutated, so the painter could do caching: texture caching in the case
of GPU painter and potentially scaled bitmap caching in the case of CPU
painter.
This modification introduces a new layer to the painting process. The
stacking context traversal no longer immediately calls the
Gfx::Painter methods. Instead, it writes serialized painting commands
into newly introduced RecordingPainter. Created list of commands is
executed later to produce resulting bitmap.
Producing painting command list will make it easier to add new
optimizations:
- It's simpler to check if the painting result is not visible in the
viewport at the command level rather than during stacking context
traversal.
- Run painting in a separate thread. The painting thread can process
serialized painting commands, while the main thread can work on the
next paintable tree and safely invalidate the previous one.
- As we consider GPU-accelerated painting support, it would be easier
to back each painting command rather than constructing an alternative
for the entire Gfx::Painter API.
This allows to partially solve the problem of cyclic dependency between
HTMLImageElement and SharedImageRequest that prevents all image
elements from being deallocated.
As it turns out, making everyone piggyback on HTML::ImageRequest had
some major flaws, as HTMLImageElement may decide to abort an ongoing
fetch or wipe out image data, even when someone else is using the same
image request.
To avoid this issue, this patch introduces SharedImageRequest, and then
implements ImageRequest on top of that.
Other clients of the ImageRequest API are moved to SharedImageRequest
as well, and ImageRequest is now only used by HTMLImageElement.
This fixes an issue with image data disappearing and leading to asserts
and/or visually absent images.
This is all ad-hoc since no spec currently exists for this behavior.
Basically, ImageStyleValue now uses ImageRequest for fetching and
decoding of images.
This already leads to visible improvements on many websites.
