In conformance with the requirements of the spec PR at
https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9546, this change adds support for
the “switch” attribute for type=checkbox “input” elements — which is
shipping in Safari (since Safari 17.4). This change also implements
support for exposing it to AT users with role=switch.
There are essentially 3 URL parsing AOs defined by the spec:
1. Parse a URL
2. Encoding parse a URL
3. Encoding parse a URL and serialize the result
Further, these are replicated between the Document and the ESO.
This patch defines these methods in accordance with the spec and updates
existing users to invoke the correct method. In places where the correct
method is ambiguous, we use the encoding parser to preserve existing ad-
hoc behavior.
The DOM spec defines what it means for an element to be an "editing
host", and the Editing spec does the same for the "editable" concept.
Replace our `Node::is_editable()` implementation with these
spec-compliant algorithms.
An editing host is an element that has the properties to make its
contents effectively editable. Editable elements are descendants of an
editing host. Concepts like the inheritable contenteditable attribute
are propagated through the editable algorithm.
Fixes an issue where selectors inside a shadow root could incorrectly
match their shadow host directly using selectors like #host,
instead of requiring :host pseudo-class selectors.
Fixes issue #2319
Resulting in a massive rename across almost everywhere! Alongside the
namespace change, we now have the following names:
* JS::NonnullGCPtr -> GC::Ref
* JS::GCPtr -> GC::Ptr
* JS::HeapFunction -> GC::Function
* JS::CellImpl -> GC::Cell
* JS::Handle -> GC::Root
Attempt 2! Reverts 2a5dbedad4
This time, set up a different combinator when producing a relative
invalid selector rather than a standalone one. This fixes the crash.
Original description below for simplicity because it still applies.
---
Selectors like `:is(.valid, &!?!?!invalid)` need to keep the invalid
part around, even though it will never match, for a couple of reasons:
- Serialization needs to include them
- For nesting, we care if a `&` appeared anywhere in the selector, even
in an invalid part.
So this patch introduces an `Invalid` simple selector type, which simply
holds its original ComponentValues. We search through these looking for
`&`, and we dump them out directly when asked to serialize.
Selectors like `:is(.valid, &!?!?!invalid)` need to keep the invalid
part around, even though it will never match, for a couple of reasons:
- Serialization needs to include them
- For nesting, we care if a `&` appeared anywhere in the selector, even
in an invalid part.
So this patch introduces an `Invalid` simple selector type, which simply
holds its original ComponentValues. We search through these looking for
`&`, and we dump them out directly when asked to serialize.
Note that this is the old CSS2 syntax, we don't support the CSS3 syntax
just yet. Also we don't actually implement the pseudo-elements, this is
really just to make the selectors distinct from the same ones without
these pseudo-elements.
This enables a nice warning in case a function becomes dead code. Also, in the
case of {Event,Node}WrapperFactory.cpp, the corresponding header was forgotten.
This would cause an issue later when we enable -Wmissing-declarations.
Is my clang-format misconfigured? Why is the diff for NodeWrapperFactory.cpp
so large?
LibWeb keeps growing and the Web namespace is filling up fast.
Let's put DOM stuff into Web::DOM, just like we already started doing
with SVG stuff in Web::SVG.
To prepare for fully qualified tag names, let's call this local_name.
Note that we still keep an Element::tag_name() around since that's what
the JS bindings end up calling into for the Element.tagName property.
Instead of creating extremely common FlyStrings like "id" and "class"
on demand every time they are needed, we now have AttributeNames.h,
which provides Web::HTML::AttributeNames::{id,class_}
This avoids a bunch of string allocations during selector matching.
It's still only a dummy as LibWeb doesn't have focused elements yet, but
at least now we don't treat "selector:focus" as just "selector".
This fixes an issue on google.com which was mostly grey - coming from
some menu item focus styles :^)
