This reverts commit 664611bae4.
It seems like the HTML spec has been misinterpreted and this text:
"... Note that in this setup, the processing model still enforces that
the user agent would never process events from any one task source out
of order."
does not mean we can't interrupt execution of task by a task with the
same task source. It just says they should be processed in the order
they were added.
Fixes hanging while navigating from PR list to PR page on GitHub.
From HTML spec https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#definitions-3
"... Note that in this setup, the processing model still enforces that
the user agent would never process events from any one task source out
of order."
I can't come up with an example that is fixed by this change. However,
debugging a bug caused by violating this assumption from the spec is
likely to be very painful.
...and use HeapFunction instead of SafeFunction for task steps.
Since there is only one EventLoop per process, it lives as a global
handle in the VM custom data.
This makes it much easier to reason about lifetimes of tasks, task
steps, and random stuff captured by them.
Since we can't simply give HTML::EventLoop control of the whole program,
we have to integrate with Core::EventLoop.
We do this by having a single-shot 0ms Core::Timer that we start when
a task is added to the queue, and restart after processing the queue and
there are still tasks in the queue.
This patch attaches a HTML::EventLoop to the main thread JS::VM used
for JavaScript bindings in the web engine.
The goal here is to model the various task scheduling mechanisms of the
HTML specification.
