Having one StyleValue for `<number>` and `<integer>` is making user code
more complicated than it needs to be. We know based on the property
being parsed, whether it wants a `<number>` or an `<integer>`, so we
can use separate StyleValue types for these.
Introduces incomplete parsing of grid shorthand property. Only
<grid-template> part of syntax is supported for now but it is enough
to significantly improve rendering of websites that use this shorthand
to define grid :)
We know what types and identifiers a property can accept, so we can use
that information to only parse things that can be accepted. This solves
some awkward ambiguity problems that we have now or will face in the
future, including:
- Is `0` a number or a length with no unit?
- Is `3.5` a number or a ratio?
- Is `bottom` an identifier, or a custom-ident?
Two CSS Parser methods are introduced here:
`parse_css_value_for_property()` attempts to parse a StyleValue that the
property can accept, skipping any types that it doesn't want.
`parse_css_value_for_properties()` does the same, but takes multiple
PropertyIDs and additionally returns which one the parsed StyleValue is
for. This is intended for parsing shorthands, so you can give it a list
of longhands you haven't yet parsed.
Subsequent commits will actually use these new methods.
This necessitated returning `nullptr` instead of just `{}` in a lot of
places. Also, some temporary hackiness in `parse_css_value()`: That
returns a special `ParseError` type already, so we now have a
`FIXME_TRY()` macro which logs the error and then returns a generic
`ParseError::InternalError` value. Eventually this macro will go away,
once I figure out how to deal with this more nicely.
The Display class already supported all specific values, and now they
will be parsed too. The display property now has a special type
DisplayStyleValue.
VALUES-4 defines the internal representation of `calc()` as a tree of
calculation nodes. ( https://www.w3.org/TR/css-values-4/#calc-internal )
VALUES-3 lacked any definition here, so we had our own ad-hoc
implementation based around the spec grammar. This commit replaces that
with CalculationNodes representing each possible node in the tree.
There are no intended functional changes, though we do now support
nested calc() which previously did not work. For example:
`width: calc( 42 * calc(3 + 7) );`
I have added an example of this to our test page.
A couple of the layout tests that used `calc()` now return values that
are 0.5px different from before. There's no visual difference, so I
have updated the tests to use the new results.
Level 4 drops the limitations of what types can be a denominator, which
means `<calc-number-sum>`, `<calc-number-product>` and
`<calc-number-value>` all go away.
This parses the new background-position-x/y longhands and properly
hooks up them up. This requires converting PositionStyleValue to
just contain two EdgeStyleValues so that it can be easily expanded
into the longhands.
