A struct with three raw pointers to other GC'd types is a pretty big
liability, let's just turn this into a Cell itself.
This comes with the additional benefit of being able to capture it in
a lambda effortlessly, without having to create handles for individual
members.
This is a continuation of the previous two commits.
As allocating a JS cell already primarily involves a realm instead of a
global object, and we'll need to pass one to the allocate() function
itself eventually (it's bridged via the global object right now), the
create() functions need to receive a realm as well.
The plan is for this to be the highest-level function that actually
receives a realm and passes it around, AOs on an even higher level will
use the "current realm" concept via VM::current_realm() as that's what
the spec assumes; passing around realms (or global objects, for that
matter) on higher AO levels is pointless and unlike for allocating
individual objects, which may happen outside of regular JS execution, we
don't need control over the specific realm that is being used there.
The environment settings object is effectively the context a piece of
script is running under, for example, it contains the origin,
responsible document, realm, global object and event loop for the
current context. This effectively replaces ScriptExecutionContext, but
it cannot be removed in this commit as EventTarget still depends on it.
https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/webappapis.html#environment-settings-object
I wanted to do this for a long time. The guts of Promise are pretty
complex, and it's easier to understand with the spec right next to it.
Also found a couple of issues along the way :^)
SPDX License Identifiers are a more compact / standardized
way of representing file license information.
See: https://spdx.dev/resources/use/#identifiers
This was done with the `ambr` search and replace tool.
ambr --no-parent-ignore --key-from-file --rep-from-file key.txt rep.txt *
Almost a year after first working on this, it's finally done: an
implementation of Promises for LibJS! :^)
The core functionality is working and closely following the spec [1].
I mostly took the pseudo code and transformed it into C++ - if you read
and understand it, you will know how the spec implements Promises; and
if you read the spec first, the code will look very familiar.
Implemented functions are:
- Promise() constructor
- Promise.prototype.then()
- Promise.prototype.catch()
- Promise.prototype.finally()
- Promise.resolve()
- Promise.reject()
For the tests I added a new function to test-js's global object,
runQueuedPromiseJobs(), which calls vm.run_queued_promise_jobs().
By design, queued jobs normally only run after the script was fully
executed, making it improssible to test handlers in individual test()
calls by default [2].
Subsequent commits include integrations into LibWeb and js(1) -
pretty-printing, running queued promise jobs when necessary.
This has an unusual amount of dbgln() statements, all hidden behind the
PROMISE_DEBUG flag - I'm leaving them in for now as they've been very
useful while debugging this, things can get quite complex with so many
asynchronously executed functions.
I've not extensively explored use of these APIs for promise-based
functionality in LibWeb (fetch(), Notification.requestPermission()
etc.), but we'll get there in due time.
[1]: https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-promise-objects
[2]: https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-jobs-and-job-queues
