StyleValueList is a list of StyleValues of the same type, for use in
properties like `margin` which accept a variable number of arguments.
I had originally hoped to simply swap the old ValueListStyleValue from
being a list of ComponentValues to one of StyleValues, but I can see now
that I will need to have both for a little while, so renamed the old
is_value_list() to is_component_value_list() temporarily.
As the new CSS parser tokenizes its input, we can no longer easily
rely on a StringStyleValue for multi-value properties. (eg, border)
ValueListStyleValue lets us wrap all of the ComponentValues that
the Parser produced for one declaration, as a single StyleValue, to
then be parsed into StyleValues by the StyleResolver.
Originally, I wanted it to be a list of StyleValues, but several
properties use syntax that makes use of non-StyleValue tokens, eg:
```css
/* Syntax using a / */
font: 12px/14px sans-serif;
/* Multiple values separated by commas */
background: url(catdog.png), url(another-image.jpg), blue;
```
Passing the ComponentValue tokens themselves means that all that
information is carried over. The alternative might be to create a
StyleValue subclass for each property and parse them fully inside
the Parser. (eg, `FontStyleValue`)
I decided against `ListStyleValue` as a name, to avoid confusion
with list styles. It's not ideal, but names are hard.
Our "frame" concept very closely matches what the web specs call a
"browsing context", so let's rename it to that. :^)
The "main frame" becomes the "top-level browsing context",
and "sub-frames" are now "nested browsing contexts".
SPDX License Identifiers are a more compact / standardized
way of representing file license information.
See: https://spdx.dev/resources/use/#identifiers
This was done with the `ambr` search and replace tool.
ambr --no-parent-ignore --key-from-file --rep-from-file key.txt rep.txt *
(...and ASSERT_NOT_REACHED => VERIFY_NOT_REACHED)
Since all of these checks are done in release builds as well,
let's rename them to VERIFY to prevent confusion, as everyone is
used to assertions being compiled out in release.
We can introduce a new ASSERT macro that is specifically for debug
checks, but I'm doing this wholesale conversion first since we've
accumulated thousands of these already, and it's not immediately
obvious which ones are suitable for ASSERT.
